Trial reportAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2023
Evaluation of impact of epidural volume extension on the quality of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing surgeries - randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEpidural volume extension is technique aiming to mitigate spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, by reducing the dose of local anaesthetics. The present study was executed to determine the effect of epidural volume extension subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing (PFN) regarding characteristics of sensory-motor block and postoperative analgesia. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this prospective, double-blind trial conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, 105 adult patients scheduled to undergo PFN were randomised into groups: control (C), 10 mL NS (E1), and 20 mL NS (E2), to receive 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally plus additional epidural volume extension with 10 and 20 mL normal saline in groups E1 and E2, respectively. The primary outcome measured was the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes measured included onset of sensory- motor block and duration of sensory block. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia was noted in patients receiving 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension (365.09 ± 101.83 and 330.06 ± 35.22 vs. 265.77 ± 38.01 min in the control group, P < 0.01). Patients who received any epidural volume extension with either 10 or 20 mL had significantly quicker onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block. No significant difference in duration of postoperative analgesia, and onset and duration of block was observed between patients receiving either 10 or 20 mL epidural volume extension.
conclusionsEpidural volume extension significantly shortened the onset of sensory-motor block and increased the duration of sensory block and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PFN under subarachnoid block; however, no such difference was observed between 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.