Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282422›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Genetic evaluation of crossbred Bos indicus cow temperament at parturition.

María F Munguía Vásquez, Clare A Gill, Penny K Riggs, Andy D Herring, James O Sanders, David G Riley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María F Munguía VásquezDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, david.riley@ag.tamu.edu, +1 (979) 845-2667.
Clare A GillDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, david.riley@ag.tamu.edu, +1 (979) 845-2667.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-1825
Penny K RiggsDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, david.riley@ag.tamu.edu, +1 (979) 845-2667.
Andy D HerringDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, david.riley@ag.tamu.edu, +1 (979) 845-2667.
James O SandersDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
David G RileyDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2353-7823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cow temperament at parturition may be mostly a measure of aggressiveness. The heritability of cow temperament at parturition in Bos taurus cows has been reported to be low. The objectives of this study were to estimate the heritability of cow temperament at parturition, conduct a genome-wide association analysis of cow temperament at the time of parturition, and estimate the correspondence of cow temperament at the time of parturition with cow productive performance and early-life temperament traits in Bos indicus crossbreds. Cow temperament was assessed from 1 to 5 indicating increasing levels of aggressiveness of cows (937 cows and 4,337 parturitions) from 2005 to 2022. Estimates of heritability and repeatability were 0.12 ± 0.024 and 0.24 ± 0.018. The estimates of proportion of phenotypic variance were 0.13 ± 0.019 and 0.02 ± 0.011 for permanent and maternal permanent environmental components, respectively. Estimates of heritability for maximum lifetime temperament score and proportions of temperament scores >1 were 0.18 ± 0.07 and 0.13 ± 0.072. Within cycles (generations), 2-yr-old cows had lower temperament score means than cows in most other age categories. There were low to moderate positive estimates of unadjusted correlation coefficients (r = 0.22 to 0.29; P < 0.05) of unadjusted temperament score with temperament measured on the same females when they were 8 mo old. There were low to moderate positive estimates of correlation coefficients (r = 0.09 to 0.37; P < 0.05) of unadjusted temperament score with calving rate, weaning rate, weaning weight per cow exposed, and weaning weight per 454 kg cow weight at weaning. Cows with the lowest temperament score had lower (P < 0.05) calving and weaning rate than cows in other temperament categories. Within 3 of 5 cycles, cows with the lowest temperament score (totally docile) had lower (P < 0.05) weaning weight per cow exposed than cows in other temperament categories. There were 2 SNP on BTA 4 associated with maximum lifetime temperament score (FDR < 0.05). The non-genetic influence of a cow's mother was documented in her own temperament measured at the time of calving; this may be a consequence of learned behavior. Less aggressiveness displayed by cows at the time of calving may be accompanied by lower reproductive and maternal performance.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyTemperamentAnimalsCattleFemaleParturitionPregnancyReproductionWeaningaggressivenessmaternalNellore-Angusparturitiontemperament

Identifiers

PMID38282422
PMCPMC10873775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.