ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2024
Working memory prioritisation effects in tactile immediate serial recall.
Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategy effects and value directed recall of sub- and supra-span word lists.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Prioritizing feature bindings across space and modality in working memory.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- The Ability to Direct Attention in Working Memory Is Not Impaired in Adults With Symptoms of ADHD.Journal of attention disorders · 2025Article
- The multicomponent model of working memory fifty years on.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025Article
- Getting value out of working memory through strategic prioritisation: Implications for storage and control.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025Review
- What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025Article
- Does value-based prioritization at working memory enhance long-term memory?Memory & cognition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence that higher-value information can be prioritised for both visual and auditory working memory. The present study examines whether valuable items can similarly be prioritised for the tactile domain. Employing an immediate serial recall procedure (ISR), participants reconstructed a 6-item tactile sequence by moving their fingers in the order of original stimulation. Participants were informed either that one serial position was worth notionally more points (prioritisation condition) or that all items were of equal value (control condition). For Experiment 1 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.