ArticleThe journal of gene medicine2024
Genome-wide polygenic risk score for rheumatoid arthritis prediction in postmenopausal women.
Article in The journal of gene medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- Using machine learning and single nucleotide polymorphisms for improving rheumatoid arthritis risk Prediction in postmenopausal women.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA), a common autoimmune disease, exhibits a vital genetic component. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) offer potential utility in predicting disease susceptibility. The present study aimed to develop and validate a PRS for predicting RA risk in postmenopausal women.
methodsThe study developed a novel PRS using 225,000 genetic variants from a GWAS dataset. The PRS was developed in a cohort of 8967 postmenopausal women and validated in an independent cohort of 6269 postmenopausal women. Among the development cohort, approximately 70% were Hispanic and approximately 30% were African American. The testing cohort comprised approximately 50% Hispanic and 50% Caucasian individuals. Stratification according to PRS quintiles revealed a pronounced gradient in RA prevalence and odds ratios.
resultsHigh PRS was significantly associated with increased RA risk in individuals aged 60-70 years, ≥ 70 years, and overweight and obese participants. Furthermore, at age 65 years, individuals in the bottom 5% of the PRS distribution have an absolute risk of RA at 30.6% (95% confidence interval = 18.5%-42.6%). The risk increased to 53.8% (95% confidence interval = 42.8%-64.9%) for those in the top 5% of the PRS distribution.
conclusionsThe PRS developed in the present study is significantly associated with RA risk, showing the potential for early screening of RA in postmenopausal women. This work demonstrates the feasibility of personalized medicine in identifying high-risk individuals for RA, indicating the need for further studies to test the utility of PRS in other populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.