Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38282072›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identifying the need for infection-related consultations in intensive care patients using machine learning models.

Leslie R Zwerwer, Christian F Luz, Dimitrios Soudis, Nicoletta Giudice, Maarten W N Nijsten, Corinna Glasner, Maurits H Renes, Bhanu Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leslie R Zwerwer *Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. l.r.zwerwer@rug.nl.
Christian F Luz *Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dimitrios SoudisCenter for Information Technology, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 1, 9747 AJ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nicoletta GiudiceCenter for Information Technology, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 1, 9747 AJ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten W N NijstenDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Corinna GlasnerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maurits H RenesDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bhanu SinhaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 713660-PRONKJEWAIL-H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection-related consultations on intensive care units (ICU) have a positive impact on quality of care and clinical outcome. However, timing of these consultations is essential and to date they are typically event-triggered and reactive. Here, we investigate a proactive approach to identify patients in need for infection-related consultations by machine learning models using routine electronic health records. Data was retrieved from a mixed ICU at a large academic tertiary care hospital including 9684 admissions. Infection-related consultations were predicted using logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting machines, and long short-term memory neural networks (LSTM). Overall, 7.8% of admitted patients received an infection-related consultation. Time-sensitive modelling approaches performed better than static approaches. Using LSTM resulted in the prediction of infection-related consultations in the next clinical shift (up to eight hours in advance) with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.921 and an area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.541. The successful prediction of infection-related consultations for ICU patients was done without the use of classical triggers, such as (interim) microbiology reports. Predicting this key event can potentially streamline ICU and consultant workflows and improve care as well as outcome for critically ill patients with (suspected) infections.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID38282072
PMCPMC10822855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.