ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Evaluating a radiotherapy deep learning synthetic CT algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep progressive learning reconstruction for fast and low-dose whole-body PET scans in an integrated PET/MR system.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based CT-free PET reconstruction image: a dual-center study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Synthetic Computed Tomography generation using deep-learning for female pelvic radiotherapy planning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Image Synthesis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging with Deep Learning: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPositron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) attenuation correction is challenging because the MR signal does not represent tissue density and conventional MR sequences cannot image bone. A novel zero echo time (ZTE) MR sequence has been previously developed which generates signal from cortical bone with images acquired in 65 s. This has been combined with a deep learning model to generate a synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for MR-only radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate this algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis.
methodsTen patients being treated with ano-rectal radiotherapy received a [Formula: see text]F-FDG-PET-MR in the radiotherapy position. Attenuation maps were generated from ZTE-based sCT (sCTAC) and the standard vendor-supplied MRAC. The radiotherapy planning CT scan was rigidly registered and cropped to generate a gold standard attenuation map (CTAC). PET images were reconstructed using each attenuation map and compared for standard uptake value (SUV) measurement, automatic thresholded gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation and GTV metabolic parameter measurement. The last was assessed for clinical equivalence to CTAC using two one-sided paired t tests with a significance level corrected for multiple testing of [Formula: see text]. Equivalence margins of [Formula: see text] were used.
resultsMean whole-image SUV differences were -0.02% (sCTAC) compared to -3.0% (MRAC), with larger differences in the bone regions (-0.5% to -16.3%). There was no difference in thresholded GTVs, with Dice similarity coefficients [Formula: see text]. However, there were larger differences in GTV metabolic parameters. Mean differences to CTAC in [Formula: see text] were [Formula: see text] (± standard error, sCTAC) and [Formula: see text] (MRAC), and [Formula: see text] (sCTAC) and [Formula: see text] (MRAC) in [Formula: see text]. The sCTAC was statistically equivalent to CTAC within a [Formula: see text] equivalence margin for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), whereas the MRAC was not ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]).
conclusionAttenuation correction using this radiotherapy ZTE-based sCT algorithm was substantially more accurate than current MRAC methods with only a 40 s increase in MR acquisition time. This did not impact tumour delineation but did significantly improve the accuracy of whole-image and tumour SUV measurements, which were clinically equivalent to CTAC. This suggests PET images reconstructed with sCTAC would enable accurate quantitative PET images to be acquired on a PET-MR scanner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.