Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281960›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Factors influencing cervical cancer re-screening in a semi-rural health district of Cameroon: a cohort study.

Sophie Evina Bolo, Bruno Kenfack, Ania Wisniak, Gilles Tankeu, Virginie Yakam, Alida Moukam, Jessica Sormani, Beat Stoll, Pierre Vassilakos, Patrick Petignat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie Evina BoloDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon. Sophie.Evina@etu.unige.ch.
Bruno KenfackDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon.
Ania WisniakInstitute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gilles TankeuDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon.
Virginie YakamDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon.
Alida MoukamDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon.
Jessica SormaniDivision of Gynaecology, Department of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Beat StollInstitute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pierre VassilakosGeneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrick PetignatDivision of Gynaecology, Department of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening participation at recommended intervals is a crucial component of cervical cancer prevention effectiveness. However, little is known regarding the rate of re-screening in a Sub-Saharan context. This study aimed to estimate the re-screening rate of women in a semi-rural after an initial HPV-based screening and identify factors that influence adherence.

methodsThis cohort study at the Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang enrolled women screened for cervical cancer over 5 years ago and due for re-screening. Women who initially tested HPV-positive (n = 132) and a random sample of HPV-negative women (n = 220) participated in a telephone survey between October 2021 and March 2022 to assess re-screening participation and reasons. Sociodemographic factors were collected, and associations with rescreening were evaluated.

resultsA total of 352 participants aged under 50 years (mean age 37.4 years) were contacted, and 203 (58.0%) completed the survey. The proportion of women who complied with the screening recommendation was 34.0% (95% CI 27.5% - 40.5%), The weighted re-screening proportion was 28.4%. Age, marital status, education level, type of employment, and place of residence were not associated with the rate of re-screening. Main reported barriers to re-screening were lack of information (39.0%), forgetfulness (39.0%), and impression of being in good health (30.0%). Women who remembered the recommended screening interval were 2 to 3 times more likely to undergo re-screening (aOR (adjusted odds ratio) = 2.3 [1.2-4.4], p = 0.013). Human papilloma virus- positive status at the initial screening was also associated with the re-screening((aOR) (95% CI): 3.4 (1.8-6.5).

conclusionFollowing an initial Human Papilloma Virus-based screening campaign in the West Region of Cameroon, one third of women adhered to re-screening within the recommended timeframe. Existing screening strategies would benefit from developing better information approaches to reinforce the importance of repeated cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCameroonCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeRural HealthBarriersCervical cancerHuman papilloma virusScreeningSub-saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID38281960
PMCPMC10822157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.