ArticleBMC surgery2024
A new mathematical model for evaluating surface changes in the mid-abdominal sagittal plane after two-level pedicle reduction osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to create a mathematical model to precalculate the acreage change in the abdominal median sagittal plane (ac-AMSP) of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) for whom two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) was planned.
methodsA single-centre retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted among 11 adults with AS. Acreage of the abdominal median sagittal plane (a-AMSP) was performed. The distances and angles between the osteotomy apexes, anterosuperior edge of T12, xiphoid process, superior edge of the pubis, and anterosuperior corner of the sacrum were measured on preoperative thoracolumbar computed tomography. A mathematical model was created using basic trigonometric functions in accordance with the abdominal parameters. Planned osteotomized vertebra angles (POVAs) were substituted into the mathematical model, and the predictive ac-AMSP (P-AC) was obtained. A paired sample t test was performed to determine the differences between the P-AC and actual ac-AMSP (A-AC) and between the predictive acreage change rate (P-CR) and actual acreage change rate (A-CR).
resultsThe mean age and GK were 44.4 ± 8.99 years and 102.9° ± 19.17°, respectively. No significant difference exists between A-CR and P-CR via mathematical modeling (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference existed between POVA and actual osteotomized vertebra angles (AOVA) (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative measurements of LL, SVA, and GK variables (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe novel mathematical model was reliable in predicting the ac-AMSP in AS patients undergoing two-level PSO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.