Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281739›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2024

Development and Validation of the Korean Version of the Multidimensional Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Scar Scale.

Jinwoo Myung, Young-Sil Kwon, Myoung-Ho Hyun, Seo Jeong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinwoo MyungDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Sil KwonCollege of General Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myoung-Ho HyunDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seo Jeong LeeDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Chung-Ang UniversityMinistry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2022S1A5A8053321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNon-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) scars are common in individuals with NSSI experiences. However, little is known about NSSI scars because related tools are limited. This study aimed to develop and validate the Korean version of the multidimensional Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Scar Scale (K-NSSI-ScarS), consisting of three components: NSSI scar measurement, NSSI scar cognition, and NSSI scar concealment.

methodsA total of 333 Korean adults with at least one NSSI scar and history of NSSI within the last 5 years (age: 18 to 39 years) completed the online survey. We conducted exploratory (n=133) and confirmatory (n=200) factor analyses of NSSI scar cognition. To measure the internal consistency of each subfactor of the scar cognition and scar concealment components, we used Cronbach's α. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to measure the test-retest reliability of the entire scale. We also assessed the convergent and construct validity of the K-NSSI-ScarS.

resultsFactor analyses showed a 5-factor structure consisting of 23 items. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliability were excellent. The moderate correlation between the five subfactors of NSSI scar cognition and related concepts (e.g., acquired capability of suicide) confirmed the convergent validity. Lastly, moderate correlations were found between NSSI scar concealment, self-concealment, NSSI scar measurement information, and the five subfactors of NSSI scar cognition.

conclusionThe results verify the psychometric properties and support the necessity of a multidimensional NSSI scar scale.

Indexed as

CognitionConcealmentMultidimensional scaleNon-Suicidal Self-InjuryScars

Identifiers

PMID38281739
PMCPMC10822741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.