Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281579›Full record

Trial reportArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2024

White Matter Hyperintensities as a Predictor of Aphasia Recovery.

Joseph S Kang, Lisa D Bunker, Melissa D Stockbridge, Argye E Hillis

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph S KangDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Lisa D BunkerDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Health Sciences, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ.
Melissa D StockbridgeDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Argye E HillisDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: argye@jhmi.org.
Johns Hopkins University · USMidwestern University · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Neural Basis of Lexical Deficits in Hyperacute StrokeR01DC005375 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Argye E. Hillis · 2002 to 2026
$11.8M
Trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Aphasia: Phase II TrialU01DC011739 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
State of the Art 3T Research ScannerS10OD021648 · OD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005375NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC011739NIH HHS S10 OD021648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relation between baseline white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and change in naming, content production, and efficiency after treatment in subacute aphasia. We hypothesized that more severe baseline WMH would result in less improvement with treatment.

designRetrospective analysis of a cohort from a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT).

settingOutpatient clinical setting or participant home.

participantsWe retrospectively reviewed imaging and behavioral data for 52 participants with subacute aphasia due to left-hemisphere ischemic stroke enrolled in the RCT. RCT inclusion criteria: English proficiency, normal/corrected-to-normal hearing/vision, and no history of neurologic conditions other than the stroke resulting aphasia. One participant with a chronic right-hemisphere lesion was retained as she presented with no residual deficits on neurologic examination. Individuals with scalp sensitivities or on medications that lower seizure threshold or any N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists were excluded. Of the 52 participants, for this analysis, 2 were excluded for not having a magnetic resonance imaging, and 7 were excluded for not participating in treatment or pre/post assessment for at least 1 outcome, resulting in final sample of 43 participants (20 women sex, M [SD] age=64.4 [11.9] and M [SD] education=14.9 [3.1] years).

interventionsParticipants received 15 sessions (2-3 times/week) of computerized lexical-semantic (ie, verification) treatment with [sham/active] transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Sessions were approximately 45 minutes each (tDCS for first 20 minutes).

main outcome measuresNaming accuracy, content units (CUs, a measure of semantically accurate production), and efficiency (ie, syllables/CU) on a picture description task.

resultsPeriventricular WMH severity was independently associated with recovery in picture naming for the active tDCS group. Deep WMH severity was associated with recovery for CU production for the sham tDCS group.

conclusionBaseline periventricular and deep WMH, among other factors, may be an important consideration for prognosis and treatment planning, especially when considered in conjunction with tDCS treatment.

Indexed as

AphasiaWhite MatterAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIschemic StrokeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesStroke RehabilitationAphasiaRehabilitationStroketDCSWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID38281579
PMCPMC11409922
OpenAlexW4391265164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.