Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281301›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2024

CRISPR-Cas9 based molecular breeding in crop plants: a review.

Muhammad Ikram, Abdul Rauf, Muhammad Junaid Rao, Muhammad Faizan Khurram Maqsood, Muhammad Zeeshan Mola Bakhsh, Maaz Ullah, Maria Batool, Muhammad Mehran, Maryam Tahira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad IkramMOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Abdul RaufNational Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Muhammad Junaid RaoState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Rd., Nanning, 530004, China. mjunaidrao@gxu.edu.cn.
Muhammad Faizan Khurram MaqsoodNational Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Muhammad Zeeshan Mola BakhshKey Laboratory of Crop Genetics Improvement, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Maaz UllahMOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Maria BatoolMOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Muhammad MehranKey Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Huazhong Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Maryam TahiraNational Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNGuangxi University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional crop breeding techniques are not quickly boosting yields to fulfill the expanding population needs. Long crop lifespans hinder the ability of plant breeding to develop superior crop varieties. Due to the arduous crossing, selecting, and challenging processes, it can take decades to establish new varieties with desired agronomic traits. Develop new plant varieties instantly to reduce hunger and improve food security. As a result of the adoption of conventional agricultural techniques, crop genetic diversity has decreased over time. Several traditional and molecular techniques, such as genetic selection, mutant breeding, somaclonal variation, genome-wide association studies, and others, have improved agronomic traits associated with agricultural plant productivity, quality, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, modern genome editing approaches based on programmable nucleases, CRISPR, and Cas9 proteins have escorted an exciting new era of plant breeding. Plant breeders and scientists worldwide rely on cutting-edge techniques like quick breeding, genome editing tools, and high-throughput phenotyping to boost crop breeding output. This review compiles discoveries in numerous areas of crop breeding, such as using genome editing tools to accelerate the breeding process and create yearly crop generations with the desired features, to describe the shift from conventional to modern plant breeding techniques.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA ShufflingCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedConventional breedingCRISPR/Cas9CRISPR/Cpf1High-throughput phenotypingMolecular techniques; food security

Identifiers

PMID38281301
OpenAlexW4391291065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.