Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281295›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2024

Rivoceranib, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, monotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (ANGEL study): an international, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Yoon-Koo Kang, Min-Hee Ryu, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Ian Chau, Harry Yoon, Jong Gwang Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Sang Chul Oh, Atsuo Takashima, Anna Kryzhanivska and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03042611 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multinational, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Plus Best Supportive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03042611 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multinational, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Compared to Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorElevar TherapeuticsRan2017 to 2020Enrolled460ConditionsGastric Cancer, Gastric AdenocarcinomaArmsRivoceranib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancements in targeted therapy for gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Yoon-Koo KangDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. ykkang@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-6583
Min-Hee RyuDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Maria Di BartolomeoFondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ian ChauRoyal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.
Harry YoonMayo Clinical Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jong Gwang KimKyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Keun-Wook LeeSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Songnam, Korea.
Sang Chul OhKorea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Atsuo TakashimaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Anna KryzhanivskaIvano-Frankivsk Regional Oncological Center, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Yee ChaoTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ludovic EvesqueCentre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Michael SchenkerCentrul de Oncologie 'Sf. Nectarie', Sectia de Oncologie Medicala, Craiova, Romania.
Arlo McGinnElevar Therapeutics, Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Yufan ZhaoElevar Therapeutics, Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Jennifer LeeElevar Therapeutics, Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Lucjan WyrwiczKlinika Onkologii I Radioterapii, Centrum Onkologii, Instytut Im.Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland.
Narikazu BokuNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo National Hospital · JPUlsan College · KRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentrum Onkologii · PLFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIvano-Frankivsk National Medical University · UAKorea University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRMayo Clinic · USRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRivoceranib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. ANGEL (NCT03042611) was a global, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating rivoceranib as 3rd-line or ≥4th-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.

methodsPatients had failed ≥2 lines of chemotherapy and were randomized 2:1 to rivoceranib 700 mg once daily or placebo with best supportive care. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by blinded independent central review (BICR).

resultsIn total, 460 patients (rivoceranib n = 308, placebo n = 152) were enrolled. OS was not statistically different for rivoceranib versus placebo (median 5.78 vs. 5.13 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.74-1.15; p = 0.4724). PFS by BICR (median 2.83 vs. 1.77 months; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.71; p < 0.0001), ORR (6.5% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.0119), and DCR (40.3 vs. 13.2%; p < 0.0001) were improved with rivoceranib versus placebo. In patients receiving ≥4th-line therapy, OS (median 6.34 vs. 4.73 months; p = 0.0192) and PFS by BICR (median 3.52 vs. 1.71 months; p < 0.0001) were improved with rivoceranib versus placebo. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events with rivoceranib were hypertension (17.9%), anemia (10.4%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (9.4%), asthenia (8.5%), and proteinuria (7.5%).

conclusionsThis study did not meet its primary OS endpoint. Compared to placebo, rivoceranib improved PFS, ORR, and DCR. Rivoceranib also improved OS in a prespecified patient subgroup receiving ≥4th-line therapy.

Indexed as

PyridinesStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodEsophagogastric JunctionHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2apatinibPyridinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Stomach neoplasmsTyrosine protein kinase inhibitorsVascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID38281295
PMCPMC10896803
OpenAlexW4391294017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.