Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281228›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024

Treating periprocedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Antoni Sabate, Ecaterina Scarlatescu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoni SabateAnesthesia Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Ecaterina ScarlatescuAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania. katyscarlatescu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-3623
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

CSL Behring CSL Behring
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cirrhosis are known to have an abnormal coagulation status, which is a particular concern when planning invasive procedures in which blood loss is possible or predictable. Careful consideration must be given to the bleeding risk for each individual patient and coagulation management strategies should be established in advance of procedural interventions, where possible. Perioperative clinical decision-making should utilize viscoelastic testing in addition to usual assessments, where possible, and focus on the well-established three pillars of patient blood management: optimization of erythropoiesis, minimization of bleeding and blood loss, and management of anemia. Restrictive transfusion policies, careful hemostatic monitoring, and a proactive approach to predicting and preventing bleeding on an individual patient basis should be central to managing perioperative bleeding in the fragile patient population with cirrhosis. This review discusses coagulation assessments and bleeding management techniques necessary before, during, and after surgical interventions in patients with cirrhosis, and provides expert clinical opinion and physician experience on the perioperative management of these patients.

Indexed as

HemorrhageLiver CirrhosisBlood CoagulationBlood TransfusionHemostasisHumansCirrhosisCoagulationLiver transplantPeriprocedural bleedingViscoelastic testing

Identifiers

PMID38281228
PMCPMC10961284
OpenAlexW4391294129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.