Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281083›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2023

Data-driven approach to quantify trust in medical devices using Bayesian networks.

Mini Thomas, Omar Boursalie, Reza Samavi, Thomas E Doyle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mini ThomasDepartment of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-6411-7569
Omar BoursalieDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Reza SamaviDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Thomas E DoyleVector Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian networks are increasingly used to quantify the uncertainty of subjective and stochastic concepts such as trust. In this article, we propose a data-driven approach to estimate Bayesian parameters in the domain of wearable medical devices. Our approach extracts the probability of a trust factor being in a specific state directly from the devices (e.g. sensor quality). The strength of the relationship between related factors is defined by expert knowledge and incorporated into the model. We use propagation rules from requirements engineering to estimate how much each trust factor contributes to the related intermediate nodes in the network and ultimately compute the trust score. The trust score is a relative measure of trustworthiness when different devices are evaluated in the same test conditions and using the same Bayesian structure. To evaluate our approach, we developed Bayesian networks for the trust quantification of similar wearable devices from two manufacturers under identical test conditions and noise levels. The results demonstrated the learnability and generalizability of our approach.

Indexed as

TrustBayes TheoremBayesian parameter estimationnon-functional requirementsrequirements engineeringtrust quantificationtrustworthy AIwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID38281083
PMCPMC10854471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.