Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38281049›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

Researcher and patient experiences of co-presenting research to people living with systemic sclerosis at a patient conference: content analysis of interviews.

Amanda Wurz, Kelsey Ellis, Julia Nordlund, Marie-Eve Carrier, Vanessa Cook, Amy Gietzen, Claire Adams, Elsa-Lynn Nassar, Danielle B Rice, Catherine Fortune and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amanda WurzSchool of Kinesiology, University of the Fraser Valley, 45190 Caen Ave, Chilliwack, BC, V2R 0N3, Canada. amanda.wurz@ufv.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-9811
Kelsey EllisFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julia NordlundLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Eve CarrierLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vanessa CookLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Amy GietzenNational Scleroderma Foundation, Tri-State Chapter, New York, USA.
Claire AdamsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Elsa-Lynn NassarLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Danielle B RiceMood Disorders Treatment and Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Catherine FortuneOttawa Scleroderma Support Group, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Genevieve GuillotSclérodermie Québec, Longueuil, QC, Canada.
Tracy MieszczakRochester Scleroderma Support Group, National Scleroderma Foundation, New York, USA.
Michelle RichardScleroderma Atlantic, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Maureen SauveScleroderma Society of Ontario, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement in research is important to ensure research questions address problems important to patients, that research is designed in a way that can effectively answer those questions, and that findings are applicable, relevant, and credible. Yet, patients are rarely involved in the dissemination stage of research. This study explored one way to engage patients in dissemination, through co-presenting research.

methodsSemi-structured, one-on-one, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with researchers and patients who co-presented research at one patient conference (the 2022 Canadian National Scleroderma Conference) in Canada. A pragmatic orientation was adopted, and following verbatim transcription, data were analyzed using conventional content analysis.

resultsOf 8 researchers who were paired with 7 patients, 5 researchers (mean age = 28 years, SD = 3.6 years) and 5 patients (mean age = 45 years, SD = 14.2 years) participated. Researcher and patient perspectives about their experiences co-presenting and how to improve the experience were captured across 4 main categories: (1) Reasons for accepting the invitation to co-present; (2) Degree that co-presenting expectations were met; (3) The process of co-presenting; and (4) Lessons learned: recommendations for co-presenting.

conclusionsFindings from this study suggest that the co-presenting experience was a rewarding and enjoyable way to tailor research dissemination to patients. We identified a patient-centred approach and meaningful and prolonged patient engagement as essential elements underlying co-presenting success.

Indexed as

Co-presentationDisseminationExperiencesPatient engagementPatient-orientedScleroderma

Identifiers

PMID38281049
PMCPMC10822162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.