Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38280975›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Automatic assessment of left ventricular function for hemodynamic monitoring using artificial intelligence and transesophageal echocardiography.

Jinyang Yu, Anders Austlid Taskén, Hans Martin Flade, Eirik Skogvoll, Erik Andreas Rye Berg, Bjørnar Grenne, Audun Rimehaug, Idar Kirkeby-Garstad, Gabriel Kiss, Svend Aakhus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jinyang YuDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. jinyang_yu@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5090-4102
Anders Austlid TaskénDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-5556
Hans Martin FladeDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eirik SkogvollDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6984-0708
Erik Andreas Rye BergDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6658-7594
Bjørnar GrenneDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-6865
Audun RimehaugDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-6083
Idar Kirkeby-GarstadDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-6187
Gabriel KissDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-1548
Svend AakhusDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-4013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a method to automatically assess LV function by measuring mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) using artificial intelligence and transesophageal echocardiography (autoMAPSE). Our aim was to evaluate autoMAPSE as an automatic tool for rapid and quantitative assessment of LV function in critical care patients. In this retrospective study, we studied 40 critical care patients immediately after cardiac surgery. First, we recorded a set of echocardiographic data, consisting of three consecutive beats of midesophageal two- and four-chamber views. We then altered the patient's hemodynamics by positioning them in anti-Trendelenburg and repeated the recordings. We measured MAPSE manually and used autoMAPSE in all available heartbeats and in four LV walls. To assess the agreement with manual measurements, we used a modified Bland-Altman analysis. To assess the precision of each method, we calculated the least significant change (LSC). Finally, to assess trending ability, we calculated the concordance rates using a four-quadrant plot. We found that autoMAPSE measured MAPSE in almost every set of two- and four-chamber views (feasibility 95%). It took less than a second to measure and average MAPSE over three heartbeats. AutoMAPSE had a low bias (0.4 mm) and acceptable limits of agreement (- 3.7 to 4.5 mm). AutoMAPSE was more precise than manual measurements if it averaged more heartbeats. AutoMAPSE had acceptable trending ability (concordance rate 81%) during hemodynamic alterations. In conclusion, autoMAPSE is feasible as an automatic tool for rapid and quantitative assessment of LV function, indicating its potential for hemodynamic monitoring.

Indexed as

Hemodynamic MonitoringVentricular Dysfunction, LeftArtificial IntelligenceEchocardiography, TransesophagealHumansMitral ValveRetrospective StudiesVentricular Function, LeftArtificial intelligenceCirculatory failureCritical careHemodynamic monitoringLeft ventricular functionTransesophageal echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.