ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024
Computed tomography-based radiomics model to predict adverse clinical outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Promptable 3D-CT Foundation Model-Based Approach for Pulmonary Embolism.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of pulmonary embolism imaging: past, present and future innovations in computed tomography (CT) and other diagnostic techniques.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Use of Radiomics to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Scoping Review of an Unresolved Clinical Challenge.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This preliminary study investigated the feasibility of a combined model constructed using radiomic features based on computed tomography (CT) and clinical features to predict adverse clinical outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Currently, there is no widely recognized predictive model. Patients with confirmed APE who underwent CT pulmonary angiography were retrospectively categorized into good and poor prognosis groups. Seventy-four patients were randomized into a training (n = 51) or validation (n = 23) cohort. Feature extraction was performed using 3D-Slicer software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to identify the optimal radiomics features and calculate the radiomics scores; subsequently, the radiomics model was developed. A combined predictive model was constructed based on radiomics scores and selected clinical features. The predictive efficacy of the three models (radiomics, clinical and combined) was assessed by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves. Furthermore, the calibration curves were graphed and the decision curve analysis was performed. Four radiomic features were screened to calculate the radiomic score. Right ventricular to left ventricular ratio (RV/LV) ≥ 1.0 and radiomics score were independent risk factors for adverse clinical outcomes. In the training and validation cohorts, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for the RV/LV ≥ 1.0 (clinical) and radiomics score prediction models were 0.778 and 0.833 and 0.907 and 0.817, respectively. The AUCs for the combined model of RV/LV ≥ 1.0 and radiomics score were 0.925 and 0.917, respectively. The combined and radiomics models had high clinical assessment efficacy for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in APE, demonstrating the clinical utility of both models. Calibration curves exhibited a strong level of consistency between the predictive and observed probabilities of poor and good prognoses in the combined model. The combined model of RV/LV ≥ 1.0 and radiomics score based on CT could accurately and non-invasively predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with APE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.