ArticleScientific reports2024
Ironing process optimization for enhanced properties in material extrusion technology using Box-Behnken Design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Study on the Influence of Inter-Layer Ironing Parameters on the Surface Quality of MEX-Fabricated PLA-LW and PLA Parts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Nozzle Speed on the Crystallinity and Solubility of Polyvinyl Alcohol in Material Extrusion.Polymers · 2025Article
- Multi-response optimization of PETG FDM parameters using taguchi-grey relational analysis and perdition by regression modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of Response Surface Methodology for Modeling and Optimization of the Top Surface Ironing Process in Parts Produced by MEX 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Material Extrusion (MEX) technology, a prominent process in the field of additive manufacturing (AM), has witnessed significant growth in recent years. The continuous quest for enhanced material properties and refined surface quality has led to the exploration of post-processing techniques. In this study, we delve into the ironing process as a vital processing step, focusing on the optimization of its parameters through the application of Design of Experiments (DoE), specifically the Box-Behnken Design (BBD). Through a systematic examination of ironing process parameters, we identified optimal conditions that resulted in a substantial reduction in surface roughness (Ra) by approximately 69%. Moreover, the integration of optimized ironing process parameters led to remarkable improvements in mechanical properties. For instance, the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) saw a substantial improvement of approximately 29%, while the compressive strength (CS) showed an increase of about 25%. The flexural strength (FS) witnessed a notable enhancement of around 35%, and the impact strength (IS) experienced a significant boost of about 162%. The introduction of ironing minimizes voids, enhances layer bonding, and reduces surface irregularities, resulting in components that not only exhibit exceptional mechanical performance but also possess refined aesthetics. This research sheds light on the transformative potential of precision experimentation, post-processing techniques, and statistical methodologies in advancing Material Extrusion technology. The findings offer practical implications for industries requiring high-performance components with structural integrity and aesthetic appeal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.