ArticleNature communications2024
An actor-model framework for visual sensory encoding.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in neuroprosthetic technologies to restore sensations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology.Eye and brain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental challenge in neuroengineering is determining a proper artificial input to a sensory system that yields the desired perception. In neuroprosthetics, this process is known as artificial sensory encoding, and it holds a crucial role in prosthetic devices restoring sensory perception in individuals with disabilities. For example, in visual prostheses, one key aspect of artificial image encoding is to downsample images captured by a camera to a size matching the number of inputs and resolution of the prosthesis. Here, we show that downsampling an image using the inherent computation of the retinal network yields better performance compared to learning-free downsampling methods. We have validated a learning-based approach (actor-model framework) that exploits the signal transformation from photoreceptors to retinal ganglion cells measured in explanted mouse retinas. The actor-model framework generates downsampled images eliciting a neuronal response in-silico and ex-vivo with higher neuronal reliability than the one produced by a learning-free approach. During the learning process, the actor network learns to optimize contrast and the kernel's weights. This methodological approach might guide future artificial image encoding strategies for visual prostheses. Ultimately, this framework could be applicable for encoding strategies in other sensory prostheses such as cochlear or limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.