ArticlePsychology of sport and exercise2024
Daily sampling frequency and sampling duration affect reliability of person-level estimates of physical activity outcomes: Optimizing Ecological Momentary Assessment studies of physical activities.
Article in Psychology of sport and exercise, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Within-person association between affect and physical activity related to depressive symptomatology: A systematic review and methodological reflections.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Pooled it
- Physical activity and mood in daily life - a multi-burst ambulatory assessment study disentangling state and trait components of within-person associations.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on the interrelationship between physical activity (PA) behaviors and EMA-assessed constructs should use measures with high reliability of both the EMA-assessed constructs and the time-matched accelerometry-assessed PA behavior. The aim of this paper is to evaluate how the reliability of accelerometry-assessed PA outcomes is affected by different EMA sampling schemes. Emulating relevant sampling schemes in EMA studies, multiple random samples of real-world accelerometer data (measured via activPAL worn for ∼7 days) were drawn that varied in the number of daily samples (3, 5, and 7 daily samples) and in the duration of each sample (5 min, 60 min, and 120 min), totaling 9 sampling schemes. The reliability of the resulting PA outcomes was estimated by correlating weekly aggregates of the sampled data with the true parameter values (weekly aggregates of all data). A total of 4231 days were analyzed from 619 participants (mean age 45 ± 16 years; 73.3 % female; 72.7 % Non-Hispanic White). At the lowest sampling duration (5 min), none of the sampling schemes reached the threshold for acceptable reliability (reliabilities ranged from 0.20 to 0.67). Using 120 min sample duration resulted in reliable person-level PA estimates (ranges 0.77 to 0.97) except for the time spent in sedentary behavior (rel = 0.68), and for minimum (rel = 0.66), and maximum (rel = 0.63) PA intensity. These three PA outcomes consistently yielded lower levels of reliability across all sampling schemes. Holding constant the total time covered in a day, sampling schemes that used more frequent samples with shorter duration resulted in greater reliability compared to sampling schemes that used less frequent samples with longer duration. Overall, the results are consistent with sampling theory - reliability increased as more time was covered. However, our results also suggested interactive effects of reliability based on sampling frequency, duration, and PA outcome. Researchers should be aware that the reliability of accelerometer-derived PA outcomes can vary depending on the sampling design of EMA studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.