ArticleGigaScience2024
FAIR data retrieval for sensitive clinical research data in Galaxy.
Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lessons learned from implementing FAIRification workflows in diabetes research in Germany.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Galaxy as a gateway to bioinformatics: Multi-Interface Galaxy Hands-on Training Suite (MIGHTS) for scRNA-seq.GigaScience · 2025Article
- FAIR data retrieval for sensitive clinical research data in Galaxy.GigaScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn clinical research, data have to be accessible and reproducible, but the generated data are becoming larger and analysis complex. Here we propose a platform for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) data access and creating reproducible findings. Standardized access to a major genomic repository, the European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGA), has been achieved with API services like PyEGA3. We aim to provide a FAIR data analysis service in Galaxy by retrieving genomic data from the EGA and provide a generalized "omics" platform for FAIR data analysis.
resultsTo demonstrate this, we implemented an end-to-end Galaxy workflow to replicate the findings from an RD-Connect synthetic dataset Beyond the 1 Million Genomes (synB1MG) available from the EGA. We developed the PyEGA3 connector within Galaxy to easily download multiple datasets from the EGA. We added the gene.iobio tool, a diagnostic environment for precision genomics, to Galaxy and demonstrate that it provides a more dynamic and interpretable view for trio analysis results. We developed a Galaxy trio analysis workflow to determine the pathogenic variants from the synB1MG trios using the GEMINI and gene.iobio tool. The complete workflow is available at WorkflowHub, and an associated tutorial was created in the Galaxy Training Network, which helps researchers unfamiliar with Galaxy to run the workflow.
conclusionsWe showed the feasibility of reusing data from the EGA in Galaxy via PyEGA3 and validated the workflow by rediscovering spiked-in variants in synthetic data. Finally, we improved existing tools in Galaxy and created a workflow for trio analysis to demonstrate the value of FAIR genomics analysis in Galaxy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.