Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38280113›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Conception and prospective multicentric validation of a Robotic Surgery Training Curriculum (RoSTraC) for surgical residents: from simulation via laboratory training to integration into the operation room.

Michael Thomaschewski, Markus Kist, Markus Zimmermann, Claudia Benecke, Jörg C Kalff, Colin M Krüger, Benno Mann, Andreas Türler, Tobias Keck, Richard Hummel

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pre-Procedural Robotic Surgery Curricula: A Systematic Review and Thematic Meta-Synthesis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: A Clinical Perspective.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael Thomaschewski *Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Markus Kist *Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Markus ZimmermannDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Claudia BeneckeDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of General, Visceral, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Colin M KrügerUniversity Clinic Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Benno MannClinic for Visceral Surgery, Augusta-Kranken-Anstalten Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andreas TürlerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Johanniter-Kliniken Bonn GmbH, Bonn, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. tobias.keck@uksh.de.
Richard HummelDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of training curricula and educational concepts for robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). It remains unclear how surgical residents can be trained in this new technology and how robotics can be integrated into surgical residency training. The conception of a training curriculum for RAS addressing surgical residents resulted in a three-step training curriculum including multimodal learning contents: basics and simulation training of RAS (step 1), laboratory training on the institutional robotic system (step 2) and structured on-patient training in the operating room (step 3). For all three steps, learning content and video tutorials are provided via cloud-based access to allow self-contained training of the trainees. A prospective multicentric validation study was conducted including seven surgical residents. Transferability of acquired skills to a RAS procedure were analyzed using the GEARS score. All participants successfully completed RoSTraC within 1 year. Transferability of acquired RAS skills could be demonstrated using a RAS gastroenterostomy on a synthetic biological organ model. GEARS scores concerning this procedure improved significantly after completion of RoSTraC (17.1 (±5.8) vs. 23.1 (±4.9), p < 0.001). In step 3 of RoSTraC, all participants performed a median of 12 (range 5-21) RAS procedures on the console in the operation room. RoSTraC provides a highly standardized and comprehensive training curriculum for RAS for surgical residents. We could demonstrate that participating surgical residents acquired fundamental and advanced RAS skills. Finally, we could confirm that all surgical residents were successfully and safely embedded into the local RAS team.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansProspective StudiesRobotic surgery trainingRobotic training curriculumTraining robotic surgery basic skillsTransferability of robotic surgery trainingValidation of ex vivo robotic surgery training

Identifiers

PMID38280113
PMCPMC10821832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.