ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024
What do nurses experience in communication when assisting in robotic surgery: an integrative literature review.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development of a Nursing Practice Framework for 5G-Enabled Cross-Regional Remote Surgery.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Perceived learning curve of the nursing team using the da vinci XI surgical system in a Brazilian university hospital.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Intelligent technologies in operating room nursing: A bibliometric analysis of research.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Poetry as reflexive lens: humanising nursing practice in robotic-assisted surgery.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- Observational
- Development of a core competency evaluation index system for specialist nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Exploring needs, prevalence and experience with robotic-assisted surgery training among residents: a mixed method study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Experiences of robotic surgery nurses regarding technostress: a qualitative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Communication and Contextual Factors in Robotic-Assisted Surgical Teams: Protocol for Developing a Taxonomy.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication in surgery is integral to the fundamentals of perioperative nursing practice and patient safety. Research exploring team communication in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is evident in the literature but little attention has been focused on how the experiences of operating room nurses' communication affect safety, practice and patient care outcomes.
objectiveTo synthesise current evidence regarding communication during robotic-assisted surgery as experienced by registered nurses.
designAn integrative literature review informed by Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) methodology was used to conduct a rigorous analysis and synthesis of evidence.
methodsA comprehensive database search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. CINAHL, Pubmed, PsychINFO and British Nursing Web of Science databases were searched using a Boolean strategy.
resultsTwenty-five relevant papers were included in this literature review. Thematic analysis revealed two main themes with four related subthemes. The two main themes are: 'Adaptive operating room nursing in RAS' and 'RAS alters team dynamics'. The four subthemes are: 'Navigating disruptions in RAS', 'RAS heightens interdependence on team working', 'Augmented communicative workflow in RAS', and 'Professional empowerment to speak up'.
conclusionsThis integrative review identifies how current research largely focuses on communication in the wider OR team. However, current evidence lacks the input of nurses. Therefore, further evidence is needed to explore nurses' experiences to highlight their perspectives. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Robotics significantly benefit patients, and this review identifies different challenges that robotic-assisted surgery nurses encounter. A better understanding of the communication from the perspective of nurses is needed to guide future research, practice education, policy development and leadership/management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.