Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38280069›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Is water vapor thermal therapy safe and feasible in elderly and frail men? The Italian experience.

Antonio Minore, Simone Morselli, Francesco Franzoso, Daniele Maruzzi, Francesco Varvello, Stefano Toso, Giovanni Ferrari, Giampaolo Siena, Enrico Conti, Rocco Papalia and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio MinoreDepartment of Urology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Simone MorselliDepartment of Urology, "Hesperia Hospital", and CURE Group, Modena, Italy.
Francesco FranzosoDepartment of Urology, Desio Hospital, Desio, Italy.
Daniele MaruzziDepartment of Urology, S. Maria Degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.
Francesco VarvelloDepartment of Urology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Alba-Bra, Italy.
Stefano TosoDepartment of Urology, "Hesperia Hospital", and CURE Group, Modena, Italy.
Giovanni FerrariDepartment of Urology, "Hesperia Hospital", and CURE Group, Modena, Italy.
Giampaolo SienaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, San Luca Nuovo, Florence, Italy.
Enrico ContiDepartment of Urology, Levante Ligure Hospital, La Spezia, Italy.
Rocco PapaliaDepartment of Urology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Francesco UricchioDepartment of Urology, AORN Ospedali dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele BalsamoDepartment of Urology, AORN Ospedali dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Roberto Mario ScarpaDepartment of Urology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Luca CindoloDepartment of Urology, "Hesperia Hospital", and CURE Group, Modena, Italy. lucacindolo@virgilio.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-2719
Hesperia Hospital · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITOspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITUniversity of Florence · ITVilla Pineta Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) has spread as minimally invasive technique in lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. Even if its safety and feasibility have been largely proved in young men, nobody has proved the same feasibility and safety in the elderly (men older than 75 years old). Our aim is to compare WVTT safety outcomes in men older than 75 with younger men.

methodsWe prospectively collected data on men who underwent water vapor thermal therapy from 2019. We compared data on operative time, number of injections, intra-operative and post-operative complications, reinterventions rate.

resultsWe enrolled 426 patients; among these, 60 were older than 75 years old, 366 were younger. Our cohorts of patients had similar results in terms of intra-operative and post-operative complications. Operative time accounts about 11 min for both groups (p = 0.535), total number of injections was seven for young men and eight for elderly (p = 0.314). We found no intra-operative complications in elderly men group and only one in the younger group (p = 0.678), while five younger men underwent clot retention, and two elderly men experienced this complication (p = 0.239). Only one transfusion occurred in the elderly group. No differences between groups occurred in terms of length of stay, post-operative urinary retention and reintervention rate, while catheterization time was longer in the elderly men.

conclusionWVTT is a safe procedure in elderly patients with comparable intra-operative and post-operative complication rate in comparison with younger patients.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedLower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaAgedFrail ElderlyHumansItalyMaleSteamTreatment OutcomeSteamAgingBenign prostatic hyperplasiaFrailtyWater vapor thermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID38280069
OpenAlexW4391278723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.