Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38280064›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

The influence of the da Vinci surgical robot on electromagnetic tracking in a clinical environment.

L Aguilera Saiz, H C Groen, W J Heerink, T J M Ruers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Navigated hepatic tumor resection using intraoperative ultrasound imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L Aguilera SaizDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.aguilera@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1675-1909
H C GroenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3587-566X
W J HeerinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-1359
T J M RuersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-3723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in surgery for cancer. Reduced overview and loss of anatomical orientation are challenges that might be solved with image-guided surgical navigation using electromagnetic tracking (EMT). However, the robot's presence may distort the electromagnetic field, affecting EMT accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robot's influence on EMT accuracy. For this purpose, two different electromagnetic field generators were used inside a clinical surgical environment: a table top field generator (TTFG) and a planar field generator (PFG). The position and orientation of sensors within the electromagnetic field were measured using an accurate in-house developed 3D board. Baseline accuracy was measured without the robot, followed by stepwise introduction of potential distortion sources (robot and robotic instruments). The absolute accuracy was determined within the entire 3D board and in the clinical working volume. For the baseline setup, median errors in the entire tracking volume within the 3D board were 0.9 mm and 0.3° (TTFG), and 1.1 mm and 0.4° (PFG). Adding the robot and instruments did not affect the TTFG's position accuracy (p = 0.60), while the PFG's accuracies decreased to 1.5 mm and 0.7° (p < 0.001). For both field generators, when adding robot and instruments, accuracies inside the clinical working volume were higher compared to the entire tracking 3D board volume, 0.7 mm and 0.3° (TTFG), and 1.1 mm and 0.7° (PFG). Introduction of a surgical robot and robotic instruments shows limited distortion of the EMT field, allowing sufficient accuracy for surgical navigation in robotic procedures.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedElectromagnetic PhenomenaHumansElectromagnetic trackingPosition accuracyRobotic surgerySurgical navigation

Identifiers

PMID38280064
PMCPMC10821979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.