ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Validate robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with four equally-spaced ports without an assistant port.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of four-port assistant-independent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy according to uterine size.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Optimal tissue retrieval in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the DEXTER® Robotic Surgery System for Total Hysterectomy with Adnexal Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the usefulness of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with four equally-spaced ports (RA-TLH/4e) without an assistant port. In RA-TLH/4e, four da Vinci ports were placed horizontally at a height of 4 cm above the umbilicus with 8 cm equal spacing. Poor development of the surgical field or difficult forceps manipulations were handled with the endoscope and forceps movement (port-hopping). Patient background, surgical outcomes, complications, port-hopping frequency were compared in three groups: RA-TLH/4e, RA-TLH with four unequally-spaced ports (RA-TLH/4u), and conventional RA-TLH with five ports (RA-TLH/5). There were no significant differences in patient background or surgical outcomes among the three groups except for age, preparation time, and hospital stay, and no cases of laparotomy conversion or serious complications. RA-TLH/4e had fewer port-hoppings than RA-TLH/4u. The minimum abdominal width showed a weak negative correlation with port-hopping frequency in RA-TLH/4u, but not in RA-TLH/4e. RA-TLH/4e allowed for a reduction in personnel and costs compared to RA-TLH/5. The equal placement of four ports allowed sufficient port spacing even for patients with narrow abdominal widths. In addition, the port-hopping technique was able to fully compensate for the lack of an assistant port. RA-TLH/4e is a highly useful technique that not only excels in safety but also reduces costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.