Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279977›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2024

Safety and feasibility study of a novel robotic system in an in vivo porcine vascular model.

Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger, Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis, Stavros Spiliopoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger2nd Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon" University General Hospital, 1st Rimini St, Chaidari, 12461, Athens, GR, Greece.
Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis2nd Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon" University General Hospital, 1st Rimini St, Chaidari, 12461, Athens, GR, Greece.
Stavros Spiliopoulos2nd Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon" University General Hospital, 1st Rimini St, Chaidari, 12461, Athens, GR, Greece. stavspiliop@med.uoa.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-0568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this preclinical study is to assess the functionality, technical feasibility, and safety of a new vascular robotic LIBERTY MATERIAL AND

methodsAn anesthetized pig served as an arterial model for the robotic device (LIBERTY

resultsAll pre-determined arteries were successfully selectively catheterized (100% technical success), by both operators. No angiographic acute complications occurred. The microcatheters and wires were manipulated using the remote portable console in an effortless manner that maintained a high level of accuracy. Mean time for selective catheterization was 131 ± 82 s. The robot's conversion function to manual operation was successfully demonstrated.

conclusionRobotic navigation and catheterization of selected target arteries were accomplished without observable vascular damage, suggesting that the LIBERTY

Indexed as

Endovascular interventionRemote interventionRobotic-assisted interventionRoboticsVisceral catheterization

Identifiers

PMID38279977
PMCPMC10821852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.