Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279966›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2024

Association of four differently processed diets with plasma and urine advanced glycation end products and serum soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products concentration in healthy dogs.

Siobhan Bridglalsingh, Stephanie Archer-Hartmann, Parastoo Azadi, Claire Barbier de La Serre, Rebecca L Remillard, Gregory D Sunvold, Joseph W Bartges

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Siobhan BridglalsinghDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-2863
Stephanie Archer-HartmannAnalytical Services, Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Parastoo AzadiAnalytical Services, Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Claire Barbier de La SerreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Rebecca L RemillardVeterinary Nutritional Consultations, Inc., Hollister, North Carolina, USA.
Gregory D SunvoldSunvold Technology, LLC, Lewisburg, Ohio, USA.
Joseph W BartgesDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7085-1420
University of Georgia · USColorado State University · USHollister (United States) · USWest Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

National Glycoscience Resource- CCRC Service and Training - NGlycoR@CCRCR24GM137782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Parastoo Azadi · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Companion Animal Nutrition and Wellness InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM137782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs), formed via the Maillard reaction (MR) during processing of foods, have been implicated in inflammatory and degenerative diseases in human beings. Cellular damage is primarily caused by AGE binding with the receptor for AGEs (RAGE) on cell membranes. An isoform of RAGE, soluble RAGE (sRAGE), acts as a decoy receptor binding circulating AGEs preventing cellular activation. Pet food manufacturing involves processing methods similar to human food processing that may increase dietary AGEs (dAGEs). We hypothesized that diet, plasma and urine AGEs, and serum sRAGE concentrations would differ between thermally processed diets. This study examined the association of four differently processed diets: ultra-processed canned wet food (WF); ultra-processed dry food (DF); moderately processed air-dried food (ADF) and minimally processed mildly cooked food (MF) on total plasma levels of the AGEs, carboxymethyllysine (CML), carboxyethyllysine (CEL), methylglyoxal hydroimidazolone-1, glyoxal hydroimidazolone-1, argpyrimidine, urine CML, CEL and lysinoalanine, and serum sRAGE concentration. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure AGEs. sRAGE concentration was measured using a commercial canine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Total dAGEs (mg/100 kcal as fed) were higher in WF than in other diets. Plasma total AGEs (nM/50 μL) were significantly higher with WF, with no difference found between DF, ADF, and MF; however, ADF was significantly higher than MF. Urine CML (nmol AGEs/mmol creatinine) was significantly higher with DF than with WF and MF. There were no significant differences in total urine AGEs or serum sRAGE concentration between diets. In conclusion, different methods of processing pet foods are associated with varied quantities of AGEs influencing total plasma AGE concentration in healthy dogs. Serum sRAGE concentration did not vary across diets but differences in total AGE/sRAGE ratio were observed between MF and WF and, ADF and DF.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietFood HandlingGlycation End Products, AdvancedReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleGlycation End Products, AdvancedReceptor for Advanced Glycation End Productsadvanced glycation end productsdogsMaillard reactionpet food processingsoluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE)

Identifiers

PMID38279966
PMCPMC11327896
OpenAlexW4391276571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.