Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279531›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

Ensemble structure of the N-terminal domain (1-267) of FUS in a biomolecular condensate.

Laura Esteban-Hofer, Leonidas Emmanouilidis, Maxim Yulikov, Frédéric H-T Allain, Gunnar Jeschke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Droplet growth, Ostwald's rule, and emergence of order in Fused in Sarcoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Investigating the Conformational Diversity of the TMR-3 Aptamer.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein ensemble modeling and analysis with MMMx.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Esteban-HoferETH Zurich, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland.
Leonidas EmmanouilidisETH Zurich, Department of Biology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maxim YulikovETH Zurich, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frédéric H-T AllainETH Zurich, Department of Biology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gunnar JeschkeETH Zurich, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: gjeschke@ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solutions of some proteins phase separate into a condensed state of high protein concentration and a dispersed state of low concentration. Such behavior is observed in living cells for a number of RNA-binding proteins that feature intrinsically disordered domains. It is relevant for cell function via the formation of membraneless organelles and transcriptional condensates. On a basic level, the process can be studied in vitro on protein domains that are necessary and sufficient for liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). We have performed distance distribution measurements by electron paramagnetic resonance for 13 sections in an N-terminal domain (NTD) construct of the protein fused in sarcoma (FUS), consisting of the QGSY-rich domain and the RGG1 domain, in the denatured, dispersed, and condensed state. Using 10 distance distribution restraints for ensemble modeling and three such restraints for model validation, we have found that FUS NTD behaves as a random-coil polymer under good-solvent conditions in both the dispersed and condensed state. Conformation distribution in the biomolecular condensate is virtually indistinguishable from the one in an unrestrained ensemble, with the latter one being based on only residue-specific Ramachandran angle distributions. Over its whole length, FUS NTD is slightly more compact in the condensed than in the dispersed state, which is in line with the theory for random coils in good solvent proposed by de Gennes, Daoud, and Jannink. The estimated concentration in the condensate exceeds the overlap concentration resulting from this theory. The QGSY-rich domain is slightly more extended, slightly more hydrated, and has slightly higher propensity for LLPS than the RGG1 domain. Our results support previous suggestions that LLPS of FUS is driven by multiple transient nonspecific hydrogen bonding and π-sp

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesSolventsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID38279531
PMCPMC10938082
OpenAlexW4391285595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.