Observational studyESC heart failure2024
Computed tomography or chest X-ray to assess pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with acute heart failure.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a predictive model for high-flow nasal cannula treatment failure in emergency department patients with acute heart failure: a retrospective secondary data analysis.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- Dyspnea in heart failure: pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and evidence from clinical trials.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for detecting acute heart failure on chest CT: prospective clinical proof-of-concept validation.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Congestion, decongestion, renal function, and diuretics in (ESC) heart failure-what's new?ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Differential diagnosis in patients with both features of pneumonia and pulmonary edema on chest computed tomography.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Lung Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography for Acute Heart Failure: Impact of Heart Failure History and Pleural Effusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Based Algorithm to Detect Heart and Lung Disease From Acute Chest Computed Tomography Scans: Protocol for an Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Initial Experience of Noninvasive Quantification of Pulmonary Congestion Utilizing the Remote Dielectric Sensing System in Pediatric Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Computed tomography or chest X-ray to assess pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWhile computed tomography (CT) is widely acknowledged as superior to chest radiographs for acute diagnostics, its efficacy in diagnosing acute heart failure (AHF) remains unexplored. This prospective study included consecutive patients with dyspnoea undergoing simultaneous low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and chest radiographs. Here, we aimed to determine if LDCT is superior to chest radiographs to confirm pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with suspected AHF. METHODS AND
resultsAn observational, prospective study, including dyspnoeic patients from the emergency department. All patients underwent concurrent clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiogram, chest radiographs, and LDCT. The primary efficacy measure to compare the two radiological methods was conditional odds ratio (cOR). The primary outcome was adjudicated AHF, ascertained by comprehensive expert consensus. The secondary outcome, echo-bnp AHF, was an objective AHF diagnosis based on echocardiographic cardiac dysfunction, elevated cardiac filling pressure, loop diuretic administration, and NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide > 300 pg/mL. Of 228 dyspnoeic patients, 64 patients (28%) had adjudicated AHF, and 79 patients (35%) had echo-bnp AHF. Patients with AHF were older (78 years vs. 73 years), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (36% vs. 55%), had higher elevated left ventricular filling pressures (98% vs. 18%), and had higher NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels (3628 pg/mL vs. 470 pg/mL). The odds to diagnose adjudicated AHF and echo-bnp AHF were up to four times greater using LDCT (cOR: 3.89 [2.15, 7.06] and cOR: 2.52 [1.45, 4.38], respectively). For each radiologic sign of pulmonary congestion, the LDCT provided superior or equivalent results as the chest radiographs, and the interrater agreement was higher using LDCT (kappa 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.95] vs. 0.73 [95% CI: 0.63, 0.82]). As first-line imaging modality, LDCT will find one additional adjudicated AHF in 12.5 patients and prevent one false-positive in 20 patients. Similar results were demonstrated for echo-bnp AHF.
conclusionsIn consecutive dyspnoeic patients admitted to the emergency department, LDCT is significantly better than chest radiographs in detecting pulmonary congestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.