Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279517›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2024

Computed tomography or chest X-ray to assess pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with acute heart failure.

Kristina Miger, Anne Sophie Overgaard Olesen, Johannes Grand, Andreas Fabricius-Bjerre, Ahmad Sajadieh, Nis Høst, Nanna Køber, Annemette Abild, Lars Pedersen, Hans Henrik Lawaetz Schultz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina MigerDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-6114
Anne Sophie Overgaard OlesenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johannes GrandDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas Fabricius-BjerreDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ahmad SajadiehDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nis HøstDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna KøberDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annemette AbildDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars PedersenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans Henrik Lawaetz SchultzDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Mikael Ploug BoesenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens Jakob ThuneDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olav W NielsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAmager Hospital · DK

Funding

Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF17SA0031406The Danish Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWhile computed tomography (CT) is widely acknowledged as superior to chest radiographs for acute diagnostics, its efficacy in diagnosing acute heart failure (AHF) remains unexplored. This prospective study included consecutive patients with dyspnoea undergoing simultaneous low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and chest radiographs. Here, we aimed to determine if LDCT is superior to chest radiographs to confirm pulmonary congestion in dyspnoeic patients with suspected AHF. METHODS AND

resultsAn observational, prospective study, including dyspnoeic patients from the emergency department. All patients underwent concurrent clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiogram, chest radiographs, and LDCT. The primary efficacy measure to compare the two radiological methods was conditional odds ratio (cOR). The primary outcome was adjudicated AHF, ascertained by comprehensive expert consensus. The secondary outcome, echo-bnp AHF, was an objective AHF diagnosis based on echocardiographic cardiac dysfunction, elevated cardiac filling pressure, loop diuretic administration, and NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide > 300 pg/mL. Of 228 dyspnoeic patients, 64 patients (28%) had adjudicated AHF, and 79 patients (35%) had echo-bnp AHF. Patients with AHF were older (78 years vs. 73 years), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (36% vs. 55%), had higher elevated left ventricular filling pressures (98% vs. 18%), and had higher NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels (3628 pg/mL vs. 470 pg/mL). The odds to diagnose adjudicated AHF and echo-bnp AHF were up to four times greater using LDCT (cOR: 3.89 [2.15, 7.06] and cOR: 2.52 [1.45, 4.38], respectively). For each radiologic sign of pulmonary congestion, the LDCT provided superior or equivalent results as the chest radiographs, and the interrater agreement was higher using LDCT (kappa 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.95] vs. 0.73 [95% CI: 0.63, 0.82]). As first-line imaging modality, LDCT will find one additional adjudicated AHF in 12.5 patients and prevent one false-positive in 20 patients. Similar results were demonstrated for echo-bnp AHF.

conclusionsIn consecutive dyspnoeic patients admitted to the emergency department, LDCT is significantly better than chest radiographs in detecting pulmonary congestion.

Indexed as

Heart FailureNatriuretic Peptide, BrainDyspneaHumansProspective StudiesStroke VolumeTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentricular Function, LeftX-RaysNatriuretic Peptide, BrainAcute heart failureChest radiographsDyspnoeaLow dose chest CTPulmonary congestion

Identifiers

PMID38279517
PMCPMC10966239
OpenAlexW4391281178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.