Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279511›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2023

Deep learning diagnostic performance and visual insights in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules on ultrasound images.

Yujiang Liu, Ying Feng, Linxue Qian, Zhixiang Wang, Xiangdong Hu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yujiang LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Ying FengDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9900-5546
Linxue QianDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhixiang WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Xiangdong HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to construct and evaluate a deep learning model, utilizing ultrasound images, to accurately differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The objective includes visualizing the model's process for interpretability and comparing its diagnostic precision with a cohort of 80 radiologists. We employed ResNet as the classification backbone for thyroid nodule prediction. The model was trained using 2096 ultrasound images of 655 distinct thyroid nodules. For performance evaluation, an independent test set comprising 100 cases of thyroid nodules was curated. In addition, to demonstrate the superiority of the artificial intelligence (AI) model over radiologists, a Turing test was conducted with 80 radiologists of varying clinical experience. This was meant to assess which group of radiologists' conclusions were in closer alignment with AI predictions. Furthermore, to highlight the interpretability of the AI model, gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was employed to visualize the model's areas of focus during its prediction process. In this cohort, AI diagnostics demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.67%, a specificity of 60%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 73%. In comparison, the panel of radiologists on average exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 62.9%. The AI's diagnostic process was significantly faster than that of the radiologists. The generated heat-maps highlighted the model's focus on areas characterized by calcification, solid echo and higher echo intensity, suggesting these areas might be indicative of malignant thyroid nodules. Our study supports the notion that deep learning can be a valuable diagnostic tool with comparable accuracy to experienced senior radiologists in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules. The interpretability of the AI model's process suggests that it could be clinically meaningful. Further studies are necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy and support auxiliary diagnoses in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningThyroid NoduleArtificial IntelligenceHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyAI interpretabilitydeep learningdiagnostic accuracyGrad-CAMResNetThyroid nodulesultrasound images

Identifiers

PMID38279511
PMCPMC10854474
OpenAlexW4391285476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.