Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279274›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Persistently High Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein Are Good Predictors of Infection in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Szalai, Mónika Lipp, Máté Verbói, Tamás Kói, Bálint Erőss, Brigitta Teutsch, Nándor Faluhelyi, Péter Hegyi, Alexandra Mikó

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acute pancreatitis: Translating early mechanisms to bedside management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dorottya TarjánCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter SzalaiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2276-7109
Mónika LippCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Máté VerbóiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Tamás KóiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Brigitta TeutschCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Nándor FaluhelyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandra MikóCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-4425
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology, National Research, Development and Innovation Fund TKP2021-EGA-23János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences FK131864Translational Medicine Foundation K131996Translational Neuroscience National Laboratory program RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00011ÚNKP-22-5 and ÚNKP-22-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund ÚNKP-23-3-II-PTE-1996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) is associated with an increased risk of organ failure and mortality. Its early recognition and timely initiation of antibiotic therapy can save patients' lives. We systematically searched three databases on 27 October 2022. In the eligible studies, the presence of infection in necrotizing pancreatitis was confirmed via a reference test, which involved either the identification of gas within the necrotic collection through computed tomography imaging or the examination of collected samples, which yielded positive results in Gram staining or culture. Laboratory biomarkers compared between sterile necrotizing pancreatitis and INP were used as the index test, and our outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Within the first 72 hours (h) after admission, the AUC of C-reactive protein (CRP) was 0.69 (confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.76), for procalcitonin (PCT), it was 0.69 (CI: 0.60-0.78), and for white blood cell count, it was 0.61 (CI: 0.47-0.75). After the first 72 h, the pooled AUC of CRP showed an elevated level of 0.88 (CI: 0.75-1.00), and for PCT, it was 0.86 (CI: 0.60-1.11). The predictive value of CRP and PCT for infection is poor within 72 h after hospital admission but seems good after the first 72 h. Based on these results, infection is likely in case of persistently high CRP and PCT, and antibiotic initiation may be recommended.

Indexed as

BiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingProcalcitoninAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansROC CurveAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninantibiotic therapyinfectionnecrosisscoring systemsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38279274
PMCPMC10816999
OpenAlexW4391106967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.