Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279233›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Swine Gastrointestinal Microbiota and the Effects of Dietary Amino Acids on Its Composition and Metabolism.

Shengfa F Liao, Feng Ji, Peixin Fan, Kristin Denryter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shengfa F LiaoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5447-0580
Feng JiInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Peixin FanDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Kristin DenryterDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Mississippi State University · USBeijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many researchers consider gut microbiota (trillions of microorganisms) an endogenous organ of its animal host, which confers a vast genetic diversity in providing the host with essential biological functions. Particularly, the gut microbiota regulates not only gut tissue structure but also gut health and gut functionality. This paper first summarized those common bacterial species (dominated by the

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAmino AcidsAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaDietDietary SupplementsEcosystemSwineAmino Acidsamino acidgastrointestinal tractmetabolismmicrobiotaswine

Identifiers

PMID38279233
PMCPMC10816286
OpenAlexW4391026643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.