Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279133›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

CT radiomics based on different machine learning models for classifying gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Huai-Wen Zhang, De-Long Huang, Yi-Ren Wang, Hao-Shu Zhong, Hao-Wen Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An interpretableFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huai-Wen Zhang *Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 330029, Nanchang, China.
De-Long Huang *School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China.
Yi-Ren Wang *School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China.
Hao-Shu ZhongDepartment of Hematology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 200040, Shanghai, China. 164678062@qq.com.
Hao-Wen PangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China. haowenpang@foxmail.com.

Funding

The Open Fund for Scientific Research of Jiangxi Cancer Hospital 2021J15The Sichuan Provincial Medical Research Project Plan S21004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe present study utilized extracted computed tomography radiomics features to classify the gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma by mainstream machine learning methods, aiming to establish an automatic classification model.

methodsWe recruited 104 pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma patients for this study. GTV and normal liver tissue samples were manually segmented into regions of interest and randomly divided into five-fold cross-validation groups. Dimensionality reduction using LASSO regression. Radiomics models were constructed via logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, Xgboost, and Adaboost algorithms. The diagnostic efficacy, discrimination, and calibration of algorithms were verified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses and calibration plot comparison.

resultsSeven screened radiomics features excelled at distinguishing the gross tumor area. The Xgboost machine learning algorithm had the best discrimination and comprehensive diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9975 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9973-0.9978] and mean MCC of 0.9369. SVM had the second best discrimination and diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9846 (95% CI: 0.9835- 0.9857), mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC)of 0.9105, and a better calibration. All other algorithms showed an excellent ability to distinguish between gross tumor area and normal liver tissue (mean AUC 0.9825, 0.9861,0.9727,0.9644 for Adaboost, random forest, logistic regression, naivem Bayes algorithm respectively).

conclusionCT radiomics based on machine learning algorithms can accurately classify GTV and normal liver tissue, while the Xgboost and SVM algorithms served as the best complementary algorithms.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenAutomatic classificationCT radiomicsHepatocellular carcinomaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38279133
PMCPMC10811872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.