Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279131›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Get Back, a person-centred digital programme targeting physical activity for patients undergoing spinal stenosis surgery-a study protocol of a randomized feasibility study.

Emelie Karlsson, Rikard Hanafi, Helena Brisby, Andreas Fors, Mike Kemani, Håkan Hedman, Jo Nijs, Mari Lundberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05806593 (Get Back, a Person-centred Digital Program Targeting Physical Activity for Patients Undergoing Spinal Stenosis Surgery - a Randomized Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05806593 nacompletednot on this map

Get Back, a Person-centred Digital Program Targeting Physical Activity for Patients Undergoing Spinal Stenosis Surgery - a Randomized Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSophiahemmet UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsSpinal Stenosis LumbarArmsGet Back pilot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emelie KarlssonBack in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden. emelie.karlsson@shh.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5954-3761
Rikard HanafiBack in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
Helena BrisbyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andreas ForsInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mike KemaniBack in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
Håkan HedmanUniversity of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jo NijsPain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Mari LundbergBack in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.

Funding

AFA Försäkring 190264Vetenskapsrådet 2021-02804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal stenosis is the most common reason for elective spine surgery, and the cardinal symptom is leg pain and discomfort when walking. Patients with spinal stenosis have a decreased level of physical activity and thereby an increased risk of poor health. Get Back is a person-centred digital programme that strives to support patients being physically active after surgery. The aim is to explore if Get Back, in its present format (referred to as Get Back

methodsThirty patients planned for decompression surgery due to central lumbar spinal stenosis who present with low physical activity, pain catastrophizing or fear of movement, will be included in a randomized feasibility study. All patients will be randomly allocated to either Get Back DISCUSSION: The results will provide information on whether Get Back in its present format is feasible and can be evaluated for effectiveness in a larger randomized controlled trial, for patients with a low physical activity level and a high fear of movement who are undergoing decompression surgery.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrails.gov 04/08/2023, registration no. NCT05806593.

Indexed as

eHealthFeasibilityPhysical activityPhysiotherapySpine disease

Identifiers

PMID38279131
PMCPMC10811854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.