Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279087›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2024

PerSurge (NOA-30) phase II trial of perampanel treatment around surgery in patients with progressive glioblastoma.

Sophie Heuer, Ina Burghaus, Maria Gose, Tobias Kessler, Felix Sahm, Philipp Vollmuth, Varun Venkataramani, Dirk Hoffmann, Matthias Schlesner, Miriam Ratliff and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pro-tumoral CaScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cancer Neuroscience: Decoding Neural Circuitry in Tumor Evolution for Targeted Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie HeuerNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ina BurghausCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS) Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maria GoseCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS) Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias KesslerNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix SahmDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp VollmuthDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Varun VenkataramaniNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk HoffmannNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias SchlesnerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Miriam RatliffClinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carsten HopfCenter for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy (CeMOS), Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, Paul-Wittsack Str. 10, 68163, Mannheim, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and Centre of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Franz RicklefsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandro M KriegDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Antje WickNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfgang WickNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank WinklerNeurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Frank.Winkler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma is the most frequent and a particularly malignant primary brain tumor with no efficacy-proven standard therapy for recurrence. It has recently been discovered that excitatory synapses of the AMPA-receptor subtype form between non-malignant brain neurons and tumor cells. This neuron-tumor network connectivity contributed to glioma progression and could be efficiently targeted with the EMA/FDA approved antiepileptic AMPA receptor inhibitor perampanel in preclinical studies. The PerSurge trial was designed to test the clinical potential of perampanel to reduce tumor cell network connectivity and tumor growth with an extended window-of-opportunity concept.

methodsPerSurge is a phase IIa clinical and translational treatment study around surgical resection of progressive or recurrent glioblastoma. In this multicenter, 2-arm parallel-group, double-blind superiority trial, patients are 1:1 randomized to either receive placebo or perampanel (n = 66 in total). It consists of a treatment and observation period of 60 days per patient, starting 30 days before a planned surgical resection, which itself is not part of the study interventions. Only patients with an expected safe waiting interval are included, and a safety MRI is performed. Tumor cell network connectivity from resected tumor tissue on single cell transcriptome level as well as AI-based assessment of tumor growth dynamics in T2/FLAIR MRI scans before resection will be analyzed as the co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints will include further imaging parameters such as pre- and postsurgical contrast enhanced MRI scans, postsurgical T2/FLAIR MRI scans, quality of life, cognitive testing, overall and progression-free survival as well as frequency of epileptic seizures. Further translational research will focus on additional biological aspects of neuron-tumor connectivity. DISCUSSION: This trial is set up to assess first indications of clinical efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in recurrent glioblastoma, a repurposed drug which inhibits neuron-glioma synapses and thereby glioblastoma growth in preclinical models. If perampanel proved to be successful in the clinical setting, it would provide the first evidence that interference with neuron-cancer interactions may indeed lead to a benefit for patients, which would lay the foundation for a larger confirmatory trial in the future.

trial registrationEU-CT number: 2023-503938-52-00 30.11.2023.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaDouble-Blind MethodHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNitrilesPyridonesQuality of LifeSeizuresTreatment OutcomeNitrilesperampanelPyridonesAMPA receptorCancer NeuroscienceConnectivity signatureGlioblastomaNeuron-glioma synapsePerampanelRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID38279087
PMCPMC10811925
OpenAlexW4391261917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.