ArticleScientific reports2024
Design of a novel analogue peptide with potent antibiofilm activities against Staphylococcus aureus based upon a sapecin B-derived peptide.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-Generation Antimicrobial Peptides for Biofilm-Associated Infections: Engineering, Biomaterial Delivery and AI-Assisted Discovery.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Functional Peptides: Comparing Synthetic and Sequence-Engineered Antibiofilm Pharmaceutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nowadays, antimicrobial peptides are promising to confront the existing global crisis of antibiotic resistance. Here, a novel analogue peptide (mKLK) was designed based upon a D-form amidated sapecin B-derived peptide (KLK) by replacing two lysine residues with two tryptophan and one leucine by lysine, and inserting one alanine. The mKLK displayed superior amphipathic helixes in which the most of hydrophobic residues are confined to one face of the helix and had a higher hydrophobic moment compared with KLK. The mKLK retained its antibacterial activity and structure in human serum, suggesting its stability to proteolytic degradation. The values of MIC and MBC for mKLK were equal to those of KLK against clinical strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). However, mKLK showed more capability of in vitro inhibiting, eradicating, and dispersing MRSA and MSSA biofilms compared with KLK. Furthermore, a remarkable inhibitory activity of mKLK against MRSA and MSSA biofilms was seen in the murine model of catheter-associated biofilm infection. Results of this study show that mKLK not only exhibits antibacterial activity and serum stability but also a potent biofilm inhibitory activity at sub-MIC concentrations, confirming its potential therapeutic advantage for preventing biofilm-associated MRSA and MSSA infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.