ArticleScientific reports2024
The chronic wound milieu changes essential oils' antibiofilm activity-an in vitro and larval model study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking chemical-composition to antimicrobial efficacy: development of an essential oil-based topical gel prototype.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Establishing essential oil stewardship through the case of rosemary and thyme oils againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Toward essential oil stewardship: strain-resolved evaluation of thyme oil activity againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Essential oils: a potential alternative with promising active ingredients for pharmaceutical formulations in chronic wound management.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Translational Insights into the Intraoperative Use of Antiseptics and Lavage Solutions Against Microorganisms Causing Orthopedic Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Imidazoles and Quaternary Ammonium Compounds as Effective Therapies against (Multidrug-Resistant) Bacterial Wound Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of post-harvest drying period on the chemical composition ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Article
- The applications and mechanisms ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Culture Shock: An Investigation into the Tolerance of Pathogenic Biofilms to Antiseptics in Environments Resembling the Chronic Wound Milieu.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Essential Oils (EOs) are currently being researched as potential antibiofilm agents to combat infections related to chronic wound biofilms. As documented in the literature, EOs' in vitro antibacterial properties are often assessed using standard microbiological media and conditions that do not accurately reflect the actual environment of a chronic wound. To address this issue, In vitro Wound Milieu (IVWM) medium, which closely resembles the environment of a chronic wound, was applied for culturing S. aureus biofilms (n = 12) in this research. Biofilms cultivated in the standard Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) medium served as a control for the experiment. Key biofilm features were analyzed and compared. Subsequently, staphylococci were exposed to the activity of thyme or rosemary EOs (T-EO and R-EO, respectively). As proof of concept, the cytotoxicity of T-EO and its antimicrobial in vivo activity were assessed using a G. mellonella larvae model. Key features of biofilm-forming cells were lower in the IVWM than in the TSB medium: biomass (up to 8 times), metabolic activity (up to 9 times), cell number (up to 100 times), and the live/dead cells ratio. Conversely, biofilm thickness was higher (up to 25%) in IVWM. These differences translated into varied responses of the biofilms to EOs exposure. The application of T-EO led to a greater reduction (up to 2 times) in 67% of biofilm-forming strains in IVWM compared to the TSB medium. Conversely, exposure to R-EO resulted in a higher reduction (up to 2.6 times) of 83% of biofilm-forming strains in TSB than in IVWM. The application of T-EO was not only non-toxic to G. mellonella larvae but also increased the survival of larvae infected with staphylococci (from 48 to 85%). Our findings suggest that EOs not only show promise as agents for treating biofilm-related wound infections but also that providing conditions reflecting the specific niche of the human body is of paramount importance in influencing the results obtained. However, before clinical application, challenges related to the methods of assessing their activity, microbial intra-species variability, and different levels of activity of various EOs should be analyzed and standardized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.