ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced prediction of bolt support drilling pressure using optimized Gaussian process regression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a novel method for predicting drilling pressure in bolt support systems by optimizing Gaussian process time series regression (GPR) using hybrid optimization algorithms. The research initially identified significant variations in prediction outcomes based on different kernel functions and historical points combinations in the GPR algorithm. To address this, we explored 160 distinct schemes combining 10 kernel functions and 16 historical points for numerical analysis. Applying three hybrid optimization algorithms-Genetic Algorithm-GPR (GA-GPR), Particle Swarm Optimization-GPR (PSO-GPR), and Ant Colony Algorithm-GPR (ACA-GPR)-we iteratively optimized these key parameters. The PSO-GPR algorithm emerged as the most effective, achieving an 80% prediction accuracy with a deviation range of 1-2 MPa, acceptable in practical drilling operations. This optimization led to the RQ kernel function with 18 historical points as the optimal combination, yielding an RMSE value of 0.0047246, in contrast to the least effective combination (E kernel function with 6 historical points) producing an RMSE of 0.035704. The final outcome of this study is a robust and efficient prediction system for underground bolt support drilling pressure, verified through practical application. This approach significantly enhances the accuracy and efficiency of support systems in geotechnical engineering, demonstrating the practical applicability of the PSO-GPR model in real-world scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.