Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38278856›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

The 6 month interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessing the quality of life in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis vs. conservative therapy.

Y M J Jonis, J A G N Wolfs, S Hummelink, H J P Tielemans, X H A Keuter, S van Kuijk, D J O Ulrich, R R W J van der Hulst, S S Qiu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02790021 (Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02790021 nacompletednot on this map

Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis (LVA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsLymphedemaArmsLymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Lymphovenous Bypass: Past, Present, and Future.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mechanisms and treatments of lymphedema.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Modern approaches to lymphatic surgery: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Y M J JonisDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J A G N WolfsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S HummelinkDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H J P TielemansDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
X H A KeuterDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
D J O UlrichDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R R W J van der HulstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S S QiuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. shanshan.qiushao@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0616-9566
Maastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

ZonMw 80-85200-98-91044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition with a detrimental impact on psychosocial and physical well-being. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis has shown promising results in alleviating physical symptoms and increasing quality of life in patients with BCRL. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect on health related quality of life (HrQol) after LVA surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with BCRL. The study is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult women with unilateral BCRL, with early stage lymphedema and viable lymphatic vessels were included. The primary outcome measure was HrQol measured by the lymphedema functioning disability and health (Lymph-ICF) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were volume difference measured by the water displacement method; the Upper Extremity Lymphedema (UEL) index; and daily use of the compression garments after 3 and 6 months. For this interim analysis 46 patients per group were included. There was a significant improvement in the domains in physical and mental function in the Lymph-ICF questionnaire in the LVA group after 6 months, (- 16.46 ± 18.5, p < 0.05, - 10.12 ± 29.5, p < 0.05 respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in the total score of the Lymph-ICF after 6 months in both groups (LVA-group; - 8.57 ± 22.6, p > 0.05, CDT-group; - 2.65 ± 18.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant volume reduction in both groups (LVA-group: 20.04 ± 196.40, p = 0.497, CDT: 33.98 ± 189.87, p = 0.236). In the LVA group, 41% partially of completely stopped wearing the compression garments after six months whereas in the CDT group 0% discontinued to use of compression garments. LVA resulted in improvement of the domains physical and mental function of the Lymph-ICF. Limb volume did not significantly improve after 6 months. However, around 42% could completely or partially stopped with the use of compression garments in the LVA group. The current results are promising, however longer follow up is required to assess long term effect of LVA for secondary lymphedema. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02790021 registered on 03/06/2016.

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsLymphatic VesselsLymphedemaAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID38278856
PMCPMC10817972
OpenAlexW4391257057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.