ArticleScientific reports2024
Rapid measurement of epidermal thickness in OCT images of skin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in ultrasound-activated nano-sonosensitizers for cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing Plantar Skin Epidermal Layer in Response to Various Insole Hardness via Deep Learning Enabled Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- From Optical to Molecular Imaging on Human Skin: A Review.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- A U-Net model for epidermal segmentation in optical coherence tomography images of actinic keratosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Rational Design and Responsive Transdermal Cargo Delivery of Microneedles in the Treatment of Melanoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- A Scoping Review of Radiofrequency Microneedling: Clinical Application and Outcome Assessment.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Precision measurement of stratum corneum thickness in OCT images using variational autoencoders and advanced DSP techniques.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Evaluating facial dermis aging in healthy Caucasian females with LC-OCT and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epidermal thickness (ET) changes are associated with several skin diseases. To measure ET, segmentation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images is essential; manual segmentation is very time-consuming and requires training and some understanding of how to interpret OCT images. Fast results are important in order to analyze ET over different regions of skin in rapid succession to complete a clinical examination and enable the physician to discuss results with the patient in real time. The well-known CNN-graph search (CNN-GS) methodology delivers highly accurate results, but at a high computational cost. Our objective was to build a computational core, based on CNN-GS, able to accurately segment OCT skin images in real time. We accomplished this by fine-tuning the hyperparameters, testing a range of speed-up algorithms including pruning and quantization, designing a novel pixel-skipping process, and implementing the final product with efficient use of core and threads on a multicore central processing unit (CPU). We name this product CNN-GS-skin. The method identifies two defined boundaries on OCT skin images in order to measure ET. We applied CNN-GS-skin to OCT skin images, taken from various body sites of 63 healthy individuals. Compared with CNN-GS, our described method reduced computation time by 130 [Formula: see text] with minimal reduction in ET determination accuracy (from 96.38 to 94.67%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.