Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38278852›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Rapid measurement of epidermal thickness in OCT images of skin.

Chieh-Hsi Lin, Brandon E Lukas, Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi, Julia Rome May, Yanzhen Pang, Carolina Puyana, Maria Tsoukas, Kamran Avanaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chieh-Hsi LinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Brandon E LukasRichard and Loan Hill Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Ali Rajabi-EstarabadiDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Julia Rome MayUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Yanzhen PangUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Carolina PuyanaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Maria TsoukasDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Kamran AvanakiRichard and Loan Hill Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. avanaki@uic.edu.

Funding

Melanoma Research Alliance 624320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal thickness (ET) changes are associated with several skin diseases. To measure ET, segmentation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images is essential; manual segmentation is very time-consuming and requires training and some understanding of how to interpret OCT images. Fast results are important in order to analyze ET over different regions of skin in rapid succession to complete a clinical examination and enable the physician to discuss results with the patient in real time. The well-known CNN-graph search (CNN-GS) methodology delivers highly accurate results, but at a high computational cost. Our objective was to build a computational core, based on CNN-GS, able to accurately segment OCT skin images in real time. We accomplished this by fine-tuning the hyperparameters, testing a range of speed-up algorithms including pruning and quantization, designing a novel pixel-skipping process, and implementing the final product with efficient use of core and threads on a multicore central processing unit (CPU). We name this product CNN-GS-skin. The method identifies two defined boundaries on OCT skin images in order to measure ET. We applied CNN-GS-skin to OCT skin images, taken from various body sites of 63 healthy individuals. Compared with CNN-GS, our described method reduced computation time by 130 [Formula: see text] with minimal reduction in ET determination accuracy (from 96.38 to 94.67%).

Indexed as

SkinTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsEpidermisHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38278852
PMCPMC10817904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.