ArticleScientific reports2024
Contrast variation method applied to structural evaluation of catalysts by X-ray small-angle scattering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Angle Scattering Techniques on In Situ Adsorption Studies: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hierarchically porous copper and gallium loaded sol-gel phosphate glasses for enhancement of wound closure.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Multimodal Synchrotron Analysis Workflow for Fuel Cell Electrocatalyst Discovery.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the process of developing carbon-supported metal catalysts, determining the catalyst particle-size distribution is an essential step, because this parameter is directly related to the catalytic activities. The particle-size distribution is most effectively determined by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). When metal catalysts are supported by high-performance mesoporous carbon materials, however, their mesopores may lead to erroneous particle-size estimation if the sizes of the catalysts and mesopores are comparable. Here we propose a novel approach to particle-size determination by introducing contrast variation-SAXS (CV-SAXS). In CV-SAXS, a multi-component sample is immersed in an inert solvent with a density equal to that of one of the components, thereby rendering that particular component invisible to X-rays. We used a mixture of tetrabromoethane and dimethyl sulfoxide as a contrast-matching solvent for carbon. As a test sample, we prepared a mixture of a small amount of platinum (Pt) catalyst and a bulk of mesoporous carbon, and subjected it to SAXS measurement in the absence and presence of the solvent. In the absence of the solvent, the estimated Pt particle size was affected by the mesopores, but in the presence of the solvent, the Pt particle size was correctly estimated in spite of the low Pt content. The results demonstrate that the CV-SAXS technique is useful for correctly determining the particle-size distribution for low-Pt-content catalysts, for which demands are increasing to reduce the use of expensive Pt.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.