Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38278816›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

MVA-based vaccine candidates encoding the native or prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike reveal differential immunogenicity in humans.

Leonie Mayer, Leonie M Weskamm, Anahita Fathi, Maya Kono, Jasmin Heidepriem, Verena Krähling, Sibylle C Mellinghoff, My Linh Ly, Monika Friedrich, Svenja Hardtke and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Leonie Mayer *Institute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. l.mayer@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-4358
Leonie M Weskamm *Institute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-7354
Anahita FathiInstitute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-9471
Maya KonoInstitute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jasmin HeidepriemDepartment of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Verena KrählingInstitute for Virology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sibylle C MellinghoffFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Centre for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), German CLL Group (GCLLSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-2503
My Linh LyInstitute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Monika FriedrichInstitute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Svenja HardtkeInstitute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-9001
Saskia BorregaardClinical Trial Center North GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas HesterkampGerman Centre for Infection Research, Translational Project Management Office, Brunswick, Germany.
Felix F LoefflerDepartment of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-2522
Asisa VolzInstitute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hanover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8757-3896
Gerd SutterDivision of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephan BeckerInstitute for Virology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christine Dahlke *Institute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marylyn M Addo *Institute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development (IIRVD), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. m.addo@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2836-9224
Universität Hamburg · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEHannover Clinical Trial Center (Germany) · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 13XP5050ADeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TI 07.001_MellinghoffDeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TTU 01.702Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TTU 01.709Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TTU 01.921Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TTU 01.924Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society) Glyco3Display
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple vaccines were developed using platforms such as viral vectors and mRNA technology. Here, we report humoral and cellular immunogenicity data from human phase 1 clinical trials investigating two recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara vaccine candidates, MVA-SARS-2-S and MVA-SARS-2-ST, encoding the native and the prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, respectively. MVA-SARS-2-ST was more immunogenic than MVA-SARS-2-S, but both were less immunogenic compared to licensed mRNA- and ChAd-based vaccines in SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals. In heterologous vaccination, previous MVA-SARS-2-S vaccination enhanced T cell functionality and MVA-SARS-2-ST boosted the frequency of T cells and S1-specific IgG levels when used as a third vaccination. While the vaccine candidate containing the prefusion-stabilized spike elicited predominantly S1-specific responses, immunity to the candidate with the native spike was skewed towards S2-specific responses. These data demonstrate how the spike antigen conformation, using the same viral vector, directly affects vaccine immunogenicity in humans.

Identifiers

PMID38278816
PMCPMC10817990
OpenAlexW4391259674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.