Observational studyOphthalmology2024
Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Natural History Study Report 1: Clinical Features and Genetic Findings.
Observational study in Ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical and genetic characterization of BEST1-associated retinal dystrophies in the Norwegian population.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Natural History of Macular Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy: Microperimetry-Derived Outcome Measures in Preparation For Clinical Trials.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Best vitelliform macular dystrophy caused by a BEST1 p.(Ser246Asn) variant coexisting with diabetic retinopathy.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Review of the clinical electrooculogram - Part 2: the bestrophinopathies and modified protocols.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Characterization of functional and structural impairments in best vitelliform macular dystrophy using visual electrophysiology and optical coherence tomography in pediatric and adult patients.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Adam9-deficient retinal pigment epithelium pseudopods maintain photoreceptor outer segment renewal despite subretinal space expansion.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- RPE pseudopods maintain photoreceptor outer segment renewal despite subretinal space expansion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Quantification of Optical Coherence Tomography Features in >3500 Patients with Inherited Retinal Disease Reveals Novel Genotype-Phenotype Associations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Advancing Insights into Pediatric Macular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of >3500 Patients with Inherited Retinal Disease from the United Kingdom.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the genetic findings, clinical spectrum, and natural history of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) in a cohort of 222 children and adults.
designSingle-center retrospective, consecutive, observational study.
participantsPatients with a clinical diagnosis of BVMD from pedigrees with a likely disease-causing monoallelic sequence variant in the BEST1 gene.
methodsData were extracted from electronic and physical case notes. Electrophysiologic assessment and molecular genetic testing were analyzed.
main outcome measuresMolecular genetic test findings and clinical findings including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), choroidal neovascularization (CNV) rates, and electrophysiologic parameters.
resultsTwo hundred twenty-two patients from 141 families were identified harboring 69 BEST1 variants. Mean age at presentation was 26.8 years (range, 1.3-84.8 years) and most patients (61.5%) demonstrated deterioration of central vision. Major funduscopic findings included 128 eyes (30.6%) with yellow vitelliform lesions, 78 eyes (18.7%) with atrophic changes, 49 eyes (11.7%) with fibrotic changes, 48 eyes (11.5%) with mild pigmentary changes, and 43 eyes (10.3%) showing a vitelliruptive appearance. Mean BCVA was 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/47) for the right eye and 0.33 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/43) for the left eye at presentation, with a mean annual loss rate of 0.013 logMAR and 0.009 logMAR, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Thirty-seven patients (17.3%) received a diagnosis of CNV over a mean follow-up of 8.0 years. Eyes with CNV that received treatment with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent showed better mean BCVA compared with eyes that were not treated with an anti-VEGF agent (0.28 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/38] vs. 0.62 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/83]). Most eyes exhibited a hyperopic refractive error (78.7%), and 13 patients (6.1%) received a diagnosis of amblyopia. Among the 3 most common variants, p.(Ala243Val) was associated with a later age of onset, better age-adjusted BCVA, and less advanced Gass stages compared with p.(Arg218Cys) and p.(Arg218His).
conclusionsBVMD shows a wide spectrum of phenotypic variability. The disease is very slowly progressive, and the observed phenotype-genotype correlations allow for more accurate prognostication and counselling. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.