ArticleStem cell reports2024
The impact of timing and injury mode on induced neurogenesis in the adult mammalian retina.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overexpressing neurogenic differentiation factor 1 in Müller cells improves retinal function after optic nerve crush injury in adult mice.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Plagl1 regulates the retinal progenitor cell to Müller glial cell transition.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- The Zebrafish as a Model for Ocular Translational Research: From Retinal Repair to Regeneration.Cells · 2025Review
- Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- A large-scale CRISPR screen reveals context-specific genetic regulation of retinal ganglion cell regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regeneration of neurons has important implications for human health, and the retina provides an accessible system to study the potential of replacing neurons following injury. In previous work, we generated transgenic mice in which neurogenic transcription factors were expressed in Müller glia (MG) and showed that they stimulated neurogenesis following inner retinal damage. It was unknown, however, whether the timing or mode of injury mattered in this process. Here, we explored these parameters on induced neurogenesis from MG and show that MG expressing Ascl1 will generate new bipolar neurons with similar efficiency irrespective of injury mode or timing. However, MG that express Ascl1-Atoh1 produce a new type of retinal ganglion-like cell after outer retinal damage, which is absent with inner retinal damage. Our data suggest that although cell fate is primarily dictated by neurogenic transcription factors, the inflammatory state of MG relative to injury can influence the outcome of induced neurogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.