Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38278153›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2024

Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond?

Klaus Hoeyer, Anna Couturier, Kali Barawi, Cheney Drew, Anders Grundtvig, Emma Lane, Anders Kristian Munk, Louise Emma Whiteley, Megan Munsie

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Klaus HoeyerDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna CouturierEuroGCT, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kali BarawiCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cheney DrewCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Anders GrundtvigDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emma LaneSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Anders Kristian MunkTANTlab, Department of Culture and Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Louise Emma WhiteleyDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Megan MunsieStem Cell Biology Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: megan.munsie@mcri.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients and their families routinely use the Internet to learn about stem cell research. What they find, is increasingly influenced by ongoing changes in how information is filtered and presented online. This article reflects on recent developments in generative artificial intelligence and how the stem cell community should respond.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceInternetHumansStem Cell Research

Identifiers

PMID38278153
PMCPMC10874854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.