Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38278147›Full record

ArticleNeuron2024

Glutamate inputs send prediction error of reward, but not negative value of aversive stimuli, to dopamine neurons.

Ryunosuke Amo, Naoshige Uchida, Mitsuko Watabe-Uchida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acute fentanyl induces opposing directions of changes in tonic and phasic dopamine release patterns and impairs Pavlovian task performance.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fluorescence detection of dopamine signaling to the primate striatum in relation to stimulus-reward associations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. How Dopamine Enables Learning from Aversion.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryunosuke AmoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Naoshige UchidaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Mitsuko Watabe-UchidaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: mitsuko@mcb.harvard.edu.

Funding

Towards a Unified Framework for Dopamine Signaling in the StriatumU19NS113201 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2019 to 2023
$18.7M
Molecular Codes for the Establishment of Functionally Segregated Dopaminergic CircuitsR01MH125162 · NIMH · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI UMEMORI, HISASHI, WATABE-UCHIDA, MITSUKO · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
The diversity of dopamine neurons: from connectivity and activity to functions.R01NS108740 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI UCHIDA, NAOSHIGE · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Dissecting the neural circuit mechanisms that generate dopamine neuron activityR01DA059751 · NIDA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Naoshige Uchida, Mitsuko Watabe-Uchida · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059751NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125162NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108740NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS113201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midbrain dopamine neurons are thought to signal reward prediction errors (RPEs), but the mechanisms underlying RPE computation, particularly the contributions of different neurotransmitters, remain poorly understood. Here, we used a genetically encoded glutamate sensor to examine the pattern of glutamate inputs to dopamine neurons in mice. We found that glutamate inputs exhibit virtually all of the characteristics of RPE rather than conveying a specific component of RPE computation, such as reward or expectation. Notably, whereas glutamate inputs were transiently inhibited by reward omission, they were excited by aversive stimuli. Opioid analgesics altered dopamine negative responses to aversive stimuli into more positive responses, whereas excitatory responses of glutamate inputs remained unchanged. Our findings uncover previously unknown synaptic mechanisms underlying RPE computations; dopamine responses are shaped by both synergistic and competitive interactions between glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs to dopamine neurons depending on valences, with competitive interactions playing a role in responses to aversive stimuli.

Indexed as

Dopaminergic NeuronsGlutamic AcidAnimalsDopamineMesencephalonMiceRewardVentral Tegmental AreaDopamineGlutamic Acidclassical conditioningcomputationdopamineglutamateglutamate sensoropioidreward prediction errorsequential conditioningtemporal difference errorventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID38278147
PMCPMC10957320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.