Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38277408›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2024

National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2016-2020.

Erin B Stallings, Jennifer L Isenburg, Rachel E Rutkowski, Russell S Kirby, Wendy N Nembhard, Theresa Sandidge, Stephan Villavicencio, Hoang H Nguyen, Daria M McMahon, Eirini Nestoridi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comparison of Wavefront-optimised Refraction Determined Pre- and Post-cycloplegia in Individuals with Down Syndrome.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Positive Longitudinal Caregiver Behavioral Ratings and Self-Reported Quality of Life in Youth With Cleft Lip and Palate in Treatment for Class III Malocclusion.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Comprehensive analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Burden of Lower Limb Deformities in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  16. Reproductive health in the liver transplant recipient.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erin B StallingsNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer L IsenburgNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-5042
Rachel E RutkowskiChiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-6042
Russell S KirbyChiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-401X
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-4049
Theresa SandidgeIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-3219
Stephan VillavicencioChiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Hoang H NguyenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-9951
Daria M McMahonSouth Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Eirini NestoridiDivision for Surveillance, Research, and Promotion of Perinatal Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura J PabstNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6020-5567
National Birth Defects Prevention Network

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe provide updated crude and adjusted prevalence estimates of major birth defects in the United States for the period 2016-2020.

methodsData were collected from 13 US population-based surveillance programs that used active or a combination of active and passive case ascertainment methods to collect all birth outcomes. These data were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates and national prevalence estimates adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity for all conditions, and maternal age for trisomies and gastroschisis. Prevalence was compared to previously published national estimates from 1999 to 2014.

resultsAdjusted national prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.63 for common truncus to 18.65 for clubfoot. Temporal changes were observed for several birth defects, including increases in the prevalence of atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, trisomy 18, and trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and decreases in the prevalence of anencephaly, common truncus, transposition of the great arteries, and cleft lip with and without cleft palate.

conclusionThis study provides updated national estimates of selected major birth defects in the United States. These data can be used for continued temporal monitoring of birth defects prevalence. Increases and decreases in prevalence since 1999 observed in this study warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeGastroschisisHeart Defects, CongenitalTransposition of Great VesselsFemaleHumansMaternal AgeUnited Statesbirth defectscongenital anomaliesnationalNBDPNprevalencesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38277408
PMCPMC10898112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.