ArticlePloS one2024
Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative T1 measurement using semiautomatic region of interest placement in myometrium.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated sternocleidomastoid ROI placement on carotid black-blood T1-weighted MRI: toward standardized plaque-to-muscle ratio assessment.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of quantitative T1 (qT1) measurements using manual and semiautomatic region of interest (ROI) placements. We hypothesized the usefulness of the semiautomatic method, which utilizes a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical relationship between the myometrium and other tissues, for minimizing ROI placement variation, thereby improving qT1 reproducibility compared to the manual approach. The semiautomatic approach, which considered anatomical relationships, was expected to enhance reproducibility by reducing ROI placement variabilities. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study recruited 23 healthy female volunteers. Data with variable flip angle (VFA) and inversion recovery were acquired using 3D-spoiled gradient echo and spin echo sequences, respectively. T1 maps were generated with VFA. Manual and semiautomatic ROI placements were independently conducted. Mean qT1 values were calculated from the T1 maps using the corresponding pixel values of the myometrial ROI. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of qT1 values was investigated. The inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of qT1 values was evaluated by calculating the coefficient of variation (CoV). Further, reproducibility was evaluated with inter- and intraobserver errors and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Bland-Altman analysis was utilized to compare the results, estimate bias, and determine the limits of agreement.
resultsThe mean inter- and intraobserver CoV of the qT1 values for semiautomatic ROI placement was significantly lower than those for manual ROI placement (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). ICCs for semiautomatic ROI placement were greater than those for manual ROI placement. Further, the mean inter- and intraobserver errors for semiautomatic ROI placement were significantly lower than those for manual ROI placement (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively).
conclusionSemiautomatic ROI placement demonstrated high reproducibility of qT1 measurements compared with manual methods. Semiautomatic ROI placement may be useful for evaluating uterine qT1 with high reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.