Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38277381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Validated respiratory drug deposition predictions from 2D and 3D medical images with statistical shape models and convolutional neural networks.

Josh Williams, Haavard Ahlqvist, Alexander Cunningham, Andrew Kirby, Ira Katz, John Fleming, Joy Conway, Steve Cunningham, Ali Ozel, Uwe Wolfram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josh WilliamsSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-3622
Haavard AhlqvistSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alexander CunninghamSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrew KirbyRoyal Hospital for Children and Young People, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7043-0549
Ira KatzConsultant, Meudon, France.
John FlemingNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in Respiratory Disease, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Joy ConwayNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in Respiratory Disease, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Steve CunninghamCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ali OzelSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0133-2002
Uwe WolframSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the one billion sufferers of respiratory disease, managing their disease with inhalers crucially influences their quality of life. Generic treatment plans could be improved with the aid of computational models that account for patient-specific features such as breathing pattern, lung pathology and morphology. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate an automated computational framework for patient-specific deposition modelling. To that end, an image processing approach is proposed that could produce 3D patient respiratory geometries from 2D chest X-rays and 3D CT images. We evaluated the airway and lung morphology produced by our image processing framework, and assessed deposition compared to in vivo data. The 2D-to-3D image processing reproduces airway diameter to 9% median error compared to ground truth segmentations, but is sensitive to outliers of up to 33% due to lung outline noise. Predicted regional deposition gave 5% median error compared to in vivo measurements. The proposed framework is capable of providing patient-specific deposition measurements for varying treatments, to determine which treatment would best satisfy the needs imposed by each patient (such as disease and lung/airway morphology). Integration of patient-specific modelling into clinical practice as an additional decision-making tool could optimise treatment plans and lower the burden of respiratory diseases.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerQuality of LifeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLung

Identifiers

PMID38277381
PMCPMC10817191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.